You are reading the article How To Save The Electrical Grid updated in December 2023 on the website Cattuongwedding.com. We hope that the information we have shared is helpful to you. If you find the content interesting and meaningful, please share it with your friends and continue to follow and support us for the latest updates. Suggested January 2024 How To Save The Electrical Grid
NEW YORK, NY – NOVEMBER 1: (EXCLUSIVE COVERAGE – PREMIUM RATES APPLY) Aerial view shot at night shows Manhattan in the aftermath of superstorm Sandy, including the blackout from the powercut south of 39th street on October 31- November 1, 2012 in New York City. (Photo by Iwan Baan/Getty Images). Iwan Baan
The explosion lit up the Manhattan skyline. A sudden boom, a one-two punch of yellow light—then everything went black. After Hurricane Sandy shoved water into Con Edison’s 14th Street substation in October, causing electricity to arc between capacitors, about a quarter million customers were left in the dark. Video of the high-voltage spectacle quickly went viral: It became an early, brilliant symbol of the massive storm system’s most pervasive and inescapable affront—a total and lingering loss of power. Across the U.S., as far west as Indiana and from Maine to North Carolina, Sandy caused hundreds of other mass outages. A tree blown down, wires ravaged by wind, a flooded power facility—each event had rippled out to affect homes far from the point of failure. The blackouts continued for weeks afterward, thwarting the region’s recovery.
While the duration of Sandy’s outages was unusual, their breadth—more than eight million homes in 21 states ultimately lost power—has become disturbingly common. In 2011, Hurricane Irene cut electricity to about 5.5 million homes. Tornadoes, ice storms, wildfires, and drought now routinely overwhelm the nation’s aging electrical infrastructure, inflicting sweeping blackouts. In the early 1990s, the U.S. experienced about 20 mass outages a year; today it’s well over 100. A 2012 Congressional Research Service report attributes much of the rise to an increase in extreme weather events. It also states that storm-related power failures cost the U.S. economy between $20 billion and $55 billion annually.
A modern grid, capable of creating and delivering efficient, reliable power even in the midst of disaster, is long overdue. Such infrastructure would be more resilient to both storms and terrorist attacks, which the National Research Council warned in November could cripple entire regions of the country for months. Many of the necessary upgrades already exist: They’ve been developed in labs and demonstrated in smart-grid projects across the country. Other steps just require common sense.STOP CASCADING FAILURES
A single tree felled by a storm like Sandy can cut off power to chúng tôi existing U.S. electric grid has a linear structure. Large power plants, typically located far from the customers they serve, produce most of the electricity. Transformers at the plants increase the voltage so it can be moved more efficiently to local substations, which reduce the voltage and send it out to neighborhoods and individual homes. When a fault current, or surge, occurs anywhere along the line, automatic circuit breakers open to halt it. That’s why a single felled tree can cut power to thousands of customers. And that’s how overgrown trees brushing high-voltage lines in Ohio could black out 50 million people along the East Coast in 2003.
One way to reduce the impact of any individual failure is to replace the linear structure with a looped one. Imagine a power line studded with five smart switches that connects back to a substation on both ends. A tree hits the line. In the old, linear system, all the customers beyond the fault point would lose power; the utility would send out a work crew to search for the cause. In the new system, switches on both sides of the fault could isolate the problem and only customers between the two switches would go dark. Then, “those switches communicate and say, ‘It’s right here, come and fix me,’ ” says John Kelly, executive director of the nonprofit Perfect Power Institute.
Another way to stop failures from cascading is to install a fault-current limiter, or what University of Arkansas engineer Alan Mantooth calls a “shock absorber for the grid.” He’s developing the refrigerator-size device at the university’s National Center for Reliable Electric Power Transmission. “As bad things happen, circuit breakers just start opening and the lights go out,” Mantooth says. Rather than simply stopping the electrical surge altogether, his machine can absorb the excess current and send a regulated amount down the line.
Utilities have been slow to adopt looped systems, even though smart switches were developed in the 1990s. Florida Power and Light, whose customers experienced multiple hurricanes in the early 2000s, was among the first to do so. “Most utilities are very averse to change,” Kelly says. “And part of it is the monopoly structure that impedes innovation and improvement.”
When large-scale change does come, it will likely arrive in high-demand areas first. “In urban centers like New York City and Los Angeles, their fault currents are getting so high that they’re having to start replacing all of their circuit breakers,” Mantooth says. A fault-current limiter would be a practical solution. “We would insert this guy into the grid,” he says, “leave the existing circuit breaker, and limit the current so that the breaker is not overwhelmed.” The new equipment helps the old equipment remain in service for longer, a much more cost-effective approach than replacing all the breakers.
Although most solar panels face south for maximum exposure, the Pecan Street smart-grid project found that west-facing panels- generate more power when demand is highest. Houses could be almost off-grid during peak hours.PLAN BETTER BACKUP
On the evening Hurricane Sandy struck, John Bradley was in his office on Broadway when the building suddenly lost power. Bradley is the associate vice president for sustainability, energy, and technical services at New York University, and he was on the phone with the local utility, Con Edison, at the time. “They were telling me they were systematically shutting down low-lying areas because they knew the storm surge and the full-moon high tide were going to hit around 9 p.m.,” he says.
It was 8:30. “I looked out my window, and all the lights were out,” Bradley recalls. “They said, ‘We’ve got some issues,’ and they got off the phone.” Nearly all of Lower Manhattan had lost power—except for much of the NYU campus.
In 2010, the university completed a project to replace its 1970s-era boilers with natural-gas-powered turbines, subterranean engines that generate 11 megawatts of electricity. Waste heat from the engines creates steam to produce an additional 2.4 megawatts and hot water, a process known as co-generation. Natural disasters were not at the top of the university’s list of concerns when the administration approved the project. “Number one was cost-effective production of electricity,” Bradley says. “Number two was reduction of greenhouse-gas emissions.” (The system, which powers 22 buildings and heats 37, is saving the university millions of dollars each year; it’s also helped reduce the campus’s carbon footprint by 20 percent.)
Natural-gas systems also kept much of the Princeton University campus and a sprawling Bronx apartment complex known as Co-op City up and running. Critical services such as hospitals, hotels, and fire stations should all have self-sufficient power generation, says Kelly. And relying on natural gas makes sense, he says, because it already flows through underground pipelines. Diesel must be trucked in to keep generators online and, during storms like Sandy, such fuel can be scarce.
Buildings can also rely on renewable-energy systems during a blackout. Solar panels on the Midtown Community School in Bayonne, New Jersey, helped power it as an evacuation center during Hurricane Sandy. But if such systems can’t automatically disconnect from the grid, utilities require them to shut down. Workers attempting to repair lines could be killed by electricity flowing back into the grid. “It’s like they’ve been on one-way streets all their life, and now all of a sudden there’s a car headed toward them,” Mantooth says.
A special inverter connected to a battery can enable buildings to island, or isolate themselves from the grid, as they continue to produce and store power. But existing technology is cost-prohibitive for homeowners. Mantooth’s lab is developing an affordable alternative: a microwave-size “green power node” that could be mounted on a garage wall. He hopes to find a manufacturer who could sell it at home stores for about $500.INVEST IN EFFICIENCY
The more power coursing through an aging infrastructure, the more vulnerable the grid will be to disruption—even without a natural disaster. Over the last three decades, U.S. household electricity usage tripled, from 30.3 million BTU per home in 1980 to 89.6 million BTU in 2009. Transformers, meanwhile, are now more than 40 years old on average, and 70 percent of transmission lines are at least 25 years old. To be resilient, the grid-—and those who rely on it—must also be more efficient.
Many utilities have already begun to replace one ubiquitous and outmoded device: the electricity meter, generally a spinning dial mounted near a thorn bush at the back of the house and read, in person, once a month. About 40 million U.S. homes now have smart meters, devices that digitally monitor and communicate home power use as often as several times an hour. The information allows utilities to track and bill more precisely—and recognize power outages instantly.
Companies such as Intel, Best Buy, and LG have also partnered with Pecan Street to test and develop products in a real-world setting. For example, Sony has installed a home energy -management system that measures the power consumption of various appliances from a single outlet and can be managed through a television set-top box. Homeowners can use the real-time data to minimize their load on the grid, shifting such activities as electric-vehicle charging to periods of surplus power.
The American Recovery and Reinvestment Act of 2009 devoted $16 billion to installing new transmission lines and implementing smart-grid projects such as Pecan Street. It’s a modest start. Truly modernizing the U.S. grid will require an investment of $673 billion, according to a recent study by the American Society of Civil Engineers. In the meantime, the costs of inaction continue to add up: Hurricane Sandy caused $69.7 billion worth of damage to New York and New Jersey. Just weeks after the storm, Governor Andrew Cuomo requested federal funding to help New York install the technology for a smarter grid. “It will be a significant investment,” New York State Smart Grid Consortium’s Manning says. “But Sandy has rewritten the opportunity to make the case.”
Kalee Thompson is a freelance writer based in Los Angeles. She plans to add solar panels to her home after she can island it. This article originally appeared in the February 2013 issue of Popular Science.
You're reading How To Save The Electrical Grid
While aligning layers in your project, the snap to grid settings can be a huge help or a massive nuisance. That’s why knowing how to change the snap to grid settings will make your life a lot easier, since you’re not forced to use snapping all the time.
Snapping automatically adjusts an object to sit at a specific point, pixel, grid, or guide, depending on the settings you choose. This is especially useful if you’re working with a grid over your canvas to guide your placement. The effect is almost like a magnet: if you hover an object close to a grid line, the object will “snap” over to fit into the grid. This will allow you that extra bit of precision when placing objects on the canvas and could give your project a cleaner overall appearance.
So to help you make the most of snapping, let’s break down everything you should know about using this feature of the program.How To Enable Snap To Grid In Photoshop
To reiterate, Snap to Grid helps you precisely place objects in Photoshop by “snapping” the object to a particular position within the grid. To enable Snap To Grid, first make sure you’ve enabled a grid on your canvas. It should look like this:
Now, any elements you add to the canvas will automatically “snap” to fit in with the lines of the grid.How To Disable Snapping In Photoshop
There may be times when you’d like to disable snapping so that you can place elements freehand. Since snapping adjusts the location of your object automatically, even just barely, it may prevent you from placing your object in the specific area you want. Especially if that area isn’t lined up with the grid.
For instance, I’d like my purple rectangle below to fit in line with the edge of the canvas so that no white is showing between the rectangle’s stroke and the canvas border.
But with snap to grid automatically lining the shape up with the grid, I can’t move it there without hiding half the stroke.
This will allow you to freely place your object without the automatic adjustment fitting it into the grid.
You can also momentarily disable Snap to Grid while you’re using the Move tool by holding down Command/Control. Keep in mind that this shortcut only works with the Move tool active (shown below).
This shortcut will only disable snapping while you’re holding down Command/Control – beyond that, snapping will remain in effect until you uncheck Snap under the View menu.What To Do When Snap To Grid Is Not Working Or Grayed Out
In some cases, Snap to Grid may not be working properly. Maybe your objects are not snapping into the Grid the way you’d expect, even though Snap to Grid seems to be enabled. Perhaps Snap to Grid isn’t even available for you, as the option is grayed out in your menu. Here are some easy fixes to these common issues with Snap to Grid.– Make Sure You’ve Enabled The Grid – Try Snapping Only To The Grid
Both the Grid tool and the Snap settings are designed to help guide you as you arrange objects in your project. Now that you understand how to enable and disable snapping, you should find it much easier to get the exact composition you want.
With snapping under control, it’s time to learn how to make the most of grids and guides in Photoshop!
How to save browser screenshots as PDF
Want to know how to save screenshot as PDF? If you’re using Mozilla or Chrome, you’ll need to install some add-ins.
It’s an easy job with a screenshot to PDF Chrome extension that you can get from the Store. And the same goes for Firefox.
If you’re not keen on downloading a PDF capture Chrome extension, using a PDF reader is a solid alternative.
Want to stick to the tools you already have? Use the good old print screen hotkey to capture your desktop and paste it to a file converter.
Capturing screenshots in Windows is quite easy: you just need to press a single key and save the image or use a simple screen capturing tool.
However, capturing screenshots from web pages can be challenging because we often need to capture the whole page.
The best solution, in this case, is to use a third-party tool to take screenshots while browsing the Internet.
No browser offers users the option to save screenshots as PDF by default. But if you’re using Google Chrome or Mozilla Firefox, you can go to their extension store and install an extension that does just that.
Some lines of work require that you take screenshots of websites daily, so arranging your system to do that as smoothly as possible can be a lifesaver.
One way you can do this is to switch to a better browser, such as Opera. It is both lightweight and fast, but the most important aspect is just how customizable it is, and how easily you can integrate various services into it.
More so, it comes with plenty of built-in features, such as Snapshot, a dedicated tool that allows you to take screenshots of your web pages, edit them, and share them with ease.
This also works with Opera’s integrated messengers, so sending screenshots straight to Facebook or WhatsApp has never been easier.
An excellent web browser that offers many useful tools, including the ability to save and print your web pages.
Download Visit websiteHow do I save a screenshot as a PDF Windows 10? 1. Download FireShot to save browser screenshots as PDF
It allows you to capture only what’s visible, a specific section of the screen, and of course the entire web page.
When you choose what to capture, a new window will immediately show up. Here, you can save the screenshot as a PDF, as a regular image, or even print it.
You can also set a few hotkeys to take screenshots by simply pressing them. In fact, there is a hotkey for every option this extension offers: Last Used Action, Capture Visible Part, Capture Selection, and of course Capture Entire page.
Fireshot is currently available in Google Chrome and Mozilla Firefox only, so if you want to save a screenshot to PDF Chrome, this is a great option.2. Use Adobe Acrobat Reader for taking screenshots
If you often take screenshots and you work with PDF documents on a daily basis, we suggest using Adobe Acrobat Reader for saving screenshots.
The tool has a built-in Snapshot feature that lets you copy an area of a PDF as an image.
Keep in mind that this feature is only available within Acrobat Reader, you can’t use it to take screenshots on your browser.
How to use the Snapshot tool in Adobe Acrobat Reader
Was this page helpful?
Start a conversation
The whales will have to wait. Right now, it’s more urgent to save Palm.
The people behind Palm devices and software have repeatedly created incredibly good products, while the leaders of the many companies involved have done everything possible to destroy the brand and kill its momentum in the market.
As Apple has proved, a successful mobile platform needs long-term thinking, clear vision and a cohesive strategy.
Observers of the mobile scene, including Yours Truly, thought HP might — finally! — bring these qualities to the long-abused Palm line.
And they can still do it. I’ll tell you how in a minute. First, allow me to recount the many ways the platform has been challenged by rudderless “leadership,” and also tell you why Palm needs to be saved.
From the beginning, Palm (a.k.a. Palm Computing, U.S. Robotics, Handspring, PalmSource, palmOne and HPwebOS, although it will always be Palm to me) has been bedeviled by fickleness and a lack of executive vision.
Jeff Hawkins invented the Palm Pilot in the early 1990s. In doing so, he created the first successful PDA, which would form the basis for the smartphone and the entire mobile industry.
Impossible to imagine now, back then most people used ring-binder type paper organizers. A minority used Sharp Wizard type electronic organizers, which didn’t sync with PCs well, and generally had clunky, super-closed software platforms.
The Palm Pilot replaced both those models of personal organization.
Hawkins invented the elements of mobile success familiar to anyone who loves iOS or Android devices: simplicity, usability, connectivity and apps.
But it didn’t take long for Palm Pilot user enthusiasm to be squandered by a sudden, jarring and needless change in direction — a pattern that would repeat itself again and again:
1995: Palm is acquired by U.S. Robotics.
1997: U.S. Robotics is acquired by 3Com.
1998: Hawkins and his team of founders leave 3Com and launch Handspring.
2000: 3Com spins off Palm as an independent company called Palm Inc.
2002: The Palm software platform is spun off as an independent company called PalmSource.
2003: Palm Inc. merges with Handspring, and the new company is named palmOne.
2005: palmOne buys PalmSource’s partial ownership in the “Palm” trademark, and calls itself “Palm” again.
2005: A Japanese company called ACCESS buys PalmSource, and renames the software platform “Palm OS Garnet.”
2006: Palm releases a Windows-Mobile device.
2006: Palm pays $44 million to ACCESS for source-code rights to Palm OS Garnet.
2009: Palm announces that it will abandon Palm OS Garnet and create a new operating system from scratch called webOS.
2010: HP acquires Palm for $1.2 billion.
2011: HP discontinues “Palm” brand, announces new line of webOS devices, including phones and a tablet designed to compete with the Apple iPad.
2011: HP launches new webOS devices.
2011: HP announces that it will stop making webOS devices.
2011: HP drops price of its tablet to $99 to get rid of otherwise un-sellable inventory.
2011: The tablet sells so well, HP announces that it will build more tablets in “one last run.”
With all these about faces, spin-offs, mergers and acquisitions, the question isn’t “Why didn’t the Palm succeed?” The question is: “How did it survive this long?”
In fact, the ability of the various Palm incarnations to gain loyal followings in spite of all these changes tells us that the Palm has enormous potential, and should not be scuttled.
It’s not too late.
If you follow current trends, the entire mobile industry will soon be owned by Apple and Google. Mobile revenue is already dominated by Apple. And future market share is likely to be dominated by Google.
RIM is in trouble. Nokia is on the ropes. Motorola will become part of the Google juggernaut. Microsoft can’t seem to get anyone interested in its Windows Mobile platform.
The world needs a third player. Palm is the best candidate, because webOS is the second best multi-touch operating system available to everyday consumers.
Downloading email attachments to your iPhone or iPad has improved over time. For a while, many third-party email apps saw an opportunity and started offering simpler and better ways to handle attachments. However, Apple has slowly closed the gap, making it easier than ever to save an email attachment.
In this post, we show you how to save attachments from emails received via the Mail app on iPhone or iPad.Where are email attachments saved?
The first question you should ask yourself is regarding the location of these attachments. If you use third-party services such as Dropbox or Google Drive, you will be able to save attachments there as well as to your Photos library and the Files app.
From my experience, there are two main categories of attachments: images (such as .png, .jpg, .gif, etc) and virtually every other file type (.pdf, .doc, .ppt, etc). There is a very slight difference when downloading images, so that’s where we’ll start.How to save image attachments
When you get ready to download an image attached to an email, iOS will assume you want to save it to your Camera Roll or Photos library. In most cases, this is actually what you intend to do, but there are occurrences where you might want to save it somewhere else.
1) Launch the Mail app and locate the email containing an image that you want to save.
2) Tap and hold your finger on the image for a second or two and select Save Image. Or tap to open the image, hit the Share button, and choose Save Image.
This will quickly save the image to your Photos library.
If you prefer to save the image elsewhere, you can do so in just another step.
1) Tap and hold your finger on the image and select Share. Or select to open the image and hit the Share button.
2) Depending on where you want to save the image, you will have to choose among different options in your Share Sheet.
3) Scroll right on the second row to select from Reminders, Amazon Drive, Notes, or use More to choose a different app. Alternatively, you can scroll down the Share Sheet and pick Save to Files which lets you save to iCloud Drive, Google Drive, Dropbox, or another connected service.
Related: How to customize your Share Sheet on iPhone and iPadHow to save files and documents from the Mail app
As mentioned before, the process to save various file types is almost identical to saving image files, except you won’t have the option to save the file to your Camera Roll, obviously.
1) Locate the file you want to save from the Mail app.
2) Tap on it and hold your finger and select Share. Or choose to open the file and hit the Share button.
3) Select where you want to save the attachment with the same basic types of options as with an image. Choose an app from the second row, using More for additional options, or scroll down and pick Save to Files for a connected storage service.
Related: How to download files and documents to iPhone or iPad
More Mail tips:
How Lucas Ruined Star Wars, and How to Save It
In every way, George Lucas ruined the franchise with the three horrendous, unwatchable monstrosities that will forever taint the Star Wars brand. I’m embarrassed that my son will grow up thinking that those three ‘prequels’ (though ‘putrid mutant offspring’ is a more apt description) are part of the great trilogy that I enjoyed so much at his age. Thinking about the newer Star Wars movies actually makes me angry, in the same way that the BP Oil Spill or “Fox and Friends” makes me angry.
It didn’t have to be this way; and, believe it or not, I think Lucas could still save the franchise, though I doubt he has the will to do so. I know there have been some great critiques of the Star Wars prequels. If you haven’t watched this multi-part review of The Phantom Menace, you’re depriving yourself of one of the only great, hilarious joys to come from that movie. Here’s where I think things went wrong.
Everybody speaks English
This was the first problem I had with the new movies, and it comes up almost immediately. In the original trilogy, almost none of the aliens spoke English. And the humans didn’t speak alien tongues, at least not out loud. Everybody said what they had to say, and they were understood. The audience got subtitles.
It led to some cool moments. In the third movie, Return of the Jedi, a bounty hunter with a raspy, alien voice forces its way into Jabba’s layer with a thermal detonator. To the audience, it’s another classic Star Wars alien, until she removes her helmet and reveals Princess Leia beneath. The switch from the cold, digital alien voice to the warm, soothing Leia reinforced the action on screen, where Han Solo was being thawed from a carbonite block.
In the prequels, the characters don’t just speak English. They speak English with annoying, stereotypical and perhaps even racist accents. They use slang that is so horrible, it’s cringe-worthy. Forget about the insufferable Jar-Jar. Everyone else, from the Trade Federation lackeys to the most minor, yet memorable alien character, usually a strong suit in Star Wars films, puts on some silly accent and slogs through the worst dialogue spoken on screen since “Howard the Duck.”
Think of the problems Lucas could have solved by using alien voices again, instead. About a third of the horrible dialogue would have been washed away, especially the banal Jar-Jar. No more silly accents or horrible voice actors.
Every actor in the movie has already seen Star Wars
The problem isn’t just that they’ve seen Star Wars, the problem is that they all act as if they are in a Star Wars movie. They act like every word is canonical. Every action and plot device is important. Geeks will pore over details for decades to come. Except that the movies all suck, so we won’t.
In the first movies, nobody had a clue what was going on, but boy did it feel like a good time! Everybody is having fun, even at the most serious moments. They trade barbs and take jabs. They steal kisses and swing from the rafters . . . literally. They call each other “nerf herder,” “fuzz ball,” “laser brain,” and it all sounds natural. In the prequels, there is too much gravitas. Perhaps because they were really long, boring movies about a trade dispute and a power grab in the senate, the actors decided to take themselves very, very seriously.
George Lucas is a horrible director
A long time ago, George Lucas directed a great movie called Star Wars. He was an unproven director in his early thirties. He had no children yet, and not a lot of money. It was a prime opportunity to make a break-out film, and he managed to come through.
Lucas did not direct the next two movies in the trilogy. He produced the movies and provided all of the financial backing, which undoubtedly gave him final say. But he didn’t direct, and he didn’t even write the screenplay, just the story.
The directors he chose were not experienced, nor did they go on to great things. But between the other directors, the screenwriters and everyone else involved, there was at least some input. There were other people to say “You know, George, this kind of sucks. I don’t think the swimming jackass alien should have a Jamaican accent.”
More than 20 years later, George Lucas got behind the camera again and directed all three of the prequels. He wrote them, adapted the screenplay and directed them. He did everything, and nobody had the power to tell him how horrible the films were turning out.
Too much explaining
I knew The Phantom Menace was a bad movie when I saw Jar-Jar for the first time. I knew it was unsalvageable when they discuss the midi-chlorians. Midi-chlorians are the technical, scientific and objective explanation for the force. In the original movies, nothing was overly explained. What’s the force? It’s all around us, it flows through us. What’s a Jedi? A knight protector; a good guy. Why is Darth Vader dressed that way? Shut up, kid, you ask too many questions.
In the prequels, Lucas answers every single question I did not ask. I do not care about any of those explanations. Where does C-3PO come from? How did Darth Vader hurt his hand? What did the Emperor look like before he became the Emperor, and what was his day job? WHO CARES?!?
The entire trilogy should have started where “Revenge of the Sith” ended. Start with Anakin Skywalker getting disfigured in a battle with Obi Wan, and then spend the next three movies chasing Jedis across the galaxy. The Clone Wars is a good plot device, but Lucas didn’t need to spend half a movie explaining where the clones came from and who made them. We get it, they’re clones. Move on.
It’s like Lucas didn’t realize what made the first trilogy so cool. Instead, he read about the things everybody liked, and decided to make three movies explaining where cool came from.
How to save the day
There is a way to save Star Wars. All we need is one more movie. Bring back the original cast. Harrison Ford, Carrie Fisher, Mark Hamil, even Kenny Baker. Give us a real sequel showing what’s going on now in the Star Wars universe, 30 years later. I don’t even care what it’s about, because it will have to be something new, instead of explaining what we already know.
Keep the aliens speaking alien languages. In fact, George Lucas shouldn’t have any say in the dialogue whatsoever. Let someone else write the screenplay. Lucas can come up with the story and name the funny looking characters in the background.
“That guy looks like a Hammerhead shark, so we’ll call him Hammerhead. And that guy looks like he should be called Greedo, so Han Solo will shoot him in the crotch.”
Keep George Lucas away from the director chair. Let Joss Whedon direct. With Serenity and Firefly, Whedon has provided a great new vision for science fiction movies that fits well with the Star Wars universe. The Star Wars galaxy is a grimy place, full of beaten-up old ships covered in scars and dirt. Whedon not only shares this vision, but he also has some new ideas and techniques on how to film action in space. Handing him the final Star Wars movie would be a dream come true for fans of the original films and Whedon fans alike. Best of all, Joss Whedon knows how to have fun.
It isn’t going to happen, of course. Star Wars is dead, strangled and beaten by a sixty-year-old serial killer, who then went and committed horrible, unspeakable acts against my dear old friend, Indiana Jones (seriously? Indiana Jones and the Flying Saucer? George, what were you thinking?). My only hope is that in six months, I won’t be sitting down to write a column about how Disney ruined Tron, because Tron might be all I have left to hand down to my children.
Update the detailed information about How To Save The Electrical Grid on the Cattuongwedding.com website. We hope the article's content will meet your needs, and we will regularly update the information to provide you with the fastest and most accurate information. Have a great day!