Trending March 2024 # Ipad 2 Vs Motorola Xoom # Suggested April 2024 # Top 11 Popular

You are reading the article Ipad 2 Vs Motorola Xoom updated in March 2024 on the website We hope that the information we have shared is helpful to you. If you find the content interesting and meaningful, please share it with your friends and continue to follow and support us for the latest updates. Suggested April 2024 Ipad 2 Vs Motorola Xoom

iPad 2 vs Motorola XOOM

Behold the new fistfight. While we have had many a competition between tablets of Android and the iPad original, this is 2011’s real brawl. We’re talking the official Google approved Android 3.0 Honeycomb tablet vs Apple’s hero product, the second generation in what’s quickly become a game-changing device in the whole world of consumer electronics. Who will emerge victorious?

Lets begin with the XOOM: This Motorola produced tablet is being carried by Verizon currently and runs Google’s first tablet-specific Android OS, Android 3.0 Honeycomb. This tablet was made by Motorola who worked closely with Google to produce what they’re pushing as the perfect platform to show off the capabilities of the Honeycomb OS. The dimensions on this device are 9.80 x 6.61 x 0.51 inches (249 x 167.8 x 12.9 mm) and the weight is right around 25.75 oz (730 g) depending on what you’ve got inside. On the front is a 10.1-inch 1280 x 800 pixel resolution WXGA display capable of delivering HD 720p video playback (AAC, H.263, H.264, MP3, MPEG-4, ACC+ Enhanced, OGG, MIDI, AMR NB, AAC+). Around the display is a black metal bezel, on the back is either a black metal cover (USA) or a silver metal cover (EURO.) There’s also a special edition floating around out there with a slightly more gold tinge to it. As for the processor you’ll find a 1GHz Dual-core NVIDIA Tegra 2. Also inside you’ll find memory up to 32GB for storage. Accelerometer, CDMA800 /1900 LTE 700, Rx diversity in all bands connection, GPS, headphone jack, Wifi 802.11 a/b/g/n, microUSB, HDMI out, Bluetooth 2.1, and over 8 hours of heavy-use battery time, with 24 hours of standby (with supposedly a max at 14 days.) Cameras include a 2 megapixel webcam on front and a 5 megapixel 720p-capturing photo and video camera on the back with dual-LED flash. Access to Android Marketplace and Google’s collection of standard apps. We’ve got reviews on Android Community [here for unboxing] and [here for a massive Q and A] as well as on SlashGear [here].

Next, the iPad 2: This is Apple’s new big fish, with the iPad 1 being one of the biggest devices in the tech universe in 2010, a second generation of this tablet must be on the ball to follow up, especially since the Android universe is responding in kind this year with a wave of opposing tablets. This new iPad comes with everything in the original plus it’s running the latest version of Apple’s iOS, version 4.3. The iPad 2 comes packed with a dual-core A5 processor.  Apple included dual-cameras, a VGA webcam up front, and a 720p camera on back – both of which we’re unsure of as far as still photos go. There is the same 9.7inch LED-backlit LCD display, but with a 33% thinner and 15% lighter frame than the original. Apple is claiming up to ten hours of battery life, even with the reduced weight. They are offering models with up to 64GB of internal storage and Wi-Fi and 3G are both supported. There’s a built in gyro, HSUPA support for enhanced 3G uploading speeds on AT&T. They also put in HDMI mirroring for your iPad so you can mirror your iPad screen on any HDTV.  That looks like a good package for some amazing online games, both on the go, and at home. In just a few minutes we’ll have a full hands-on look at this brand new device so you’ll be able to judge it your nicest or harshest in the correct amount of light.

EDIT – for those of you who prefer a more list-like and less paragraph-esque sort of look at these two tablets, here’s this:

OS Android 3.0 Honeycomb

Display 10.1-inch WXGA 1280 x 800 Pixel Resolution Touchscreen

Weight 730 g

Dimensions 9.80 x 6.61 x 0.51 inches

Color Black [USA], Silver [EURO], Gold [SE] – all variations in back panel

Cameras – front, -back

Processor Dual-Core NVIDIA Tegra 2

Battery 8 hours heavy use (so says we), up to 14 days standby

Price $799 Verizon, $600 Verizon Wifi-Only, £499.99 Euro Wifi-Only

Connections accelerometer, CDMA800 /1900 LTE 700 (4G), Rx diversity in all bands connection, GPS, headphone jack, Wifi 802.11 a/b/g/n, microUSB, HDMI out, Bluetooth 2.1, mic, 3.5 mm stereo headphone jack, miniUSB

OS iOS 4.3

Display 9.7-inch LED-backlit IPS LCD 1024 x 768 Resolution Touchscreen

Weight 613g [AT&T], 607g [VERIZON], 601g [WIFI]

Dimensions 9.5 x 7.31 x .34 inches

Color Black or White – both variations in front bezel

Cameras VGA Webcam (unknown quality) – front, 720p Video (additional qualities unknown) -back

Processor Dual-Core Apple A5

Battery 10 hours heavy use (says Apple), up to 1 month standby

Price $499 16GB, $599 32GB, $699 64GB, $629 16GB+3G, $729 32GB+3G, $829 64GB+3G – all models include Wifi

Connections gyroscope, accelerometer, ambient light sensor, digital compass, HUSPA support, HDMI out, Wifi 802.11a/b/g/n, 3G, Bluetooth 2.1 + EDR technology, mic, 3.5 mm stereo headphone jack, 30-pin dock connector port, GPS and Cellular location on 3G models

One thing we should mention here is that neither of these devices are fully released just yet. There’s certainly testers out there for the XOOM, but the iPad 2 has been under HEAVY wraps for some time now. Once we get the chance to put the iPad 2 through the same hoops we’ve been pushing the XOOM through, we’ll know for sure who mister victorious is.

You're reading Ipad 2 Vs Motorola Xoom

Tesco Hudl 2 Vs Ipad Mini 4 Comparison

So buying the still excellent Hudl 2, which may have less impressive features but will be ideal for browsing the web, playing causal games, watching movies, using social media, replying to emails and more, and you’ll have £300 left over to spend on something else. So if you’ve read this entire comparison and are still considering the Hudl 2 then that should be all you need to know!

Apple has just unveiled its new iPad mini 4, which unlike its predecessor has some pretty significant spec bumps to make it thinner, lighter and speedier. Last year, we compared the iPad mini 3 with the Tesco Hudl 2 and decided that the iPad mini 3 wasn’t worth the £190 extra, but is the iPad mini 4 worth the extra money? We investigate in our Tesco Hudl 2 vs iPad mini 4 comparison.

Hudl 2 vs iPad mini 4 comparison: UK price and availability

The Tesco Hudl 2 is one of the best budget tablets you can buy, currently available for a brilliant £99. That’s compared with the iPad mini 4’s £319 price tag, so you’re looking at an additional £220 if you opt for Apple’s tablet. You could buy three Tesco Hudl 2’s for the price of one iPad mini 4. See also: Best tablets of 2024

And we’re only talking about the starting price for the iPad mini, too. If you want the 64GB or 128GB you’re looking at £399 or £479 respectively, and add £100 to each price tag if you want to throw in 4G connectivity.

The Tesco Hudl 2 is only available in one model with 16GB of storage, and it’s WiFi only. It does offer a microSD card slot to allow you to add up to 32GB more space, though.

Both tablets are available to buy now, but which you choose is ultimately going to come down to budget. However, even if you’ve got the funds for the £319 iPad mini 4, it’s well worth considering whether you really need to spend it or whether the £99 Tesco Hudl 2 can in fact do everything you’re looking for in a tablet.

Hudl 2 vs iPad mini 4 comparison: Design and build

It’s pretty clear which of these tablets is the cheaper of the two just by looking at them, purely because the iPad mini 4 is made with sleek, stylish aluminium while the Hudl 2 is made with matt plastic. Both look great, but it’s obvious which is designed to look more premium. Plus, the Hudl 2 has thicker bezels around the display than the iPad mini 4.

We found the Hudl 2 to be easy to grip and comfortable to hold, though, and it comes in a wide variety of fun colours. The iPad mini 4’s colour options are Silver, Gold and Slate Grey.

Getting down to numbers now, you’ll find that the Hudl 2 is bigger overall (not least because it has an 8.3in display while the iPad mini 4’s display is 7.9in), and is thicker at 9mm and heavier at 410g.

The iPad mini 4 is an amazing 6.1mm thick and 299g, so is certainly more portable and you’ll hardly notice that it’s in your handbag or even your suit pocket, while the Hudl 2 might not quite fit in a handbag and you’re much more likely to be aware of its weight.

Here, we’d say choose the iPad mini 4 if looks are super-important to you and you plan on taking it out and about regularly. Otherwise, you could opt for the still lovely-looking Hudl 2 and save yourself £220…

Hudl 3 vs iPad mini 4 comparison: Display

As mentioned, the iPad mini 4’s display is smaller than the Hudl 2’s, at 7.9in diagonally compared with 8.3in.

That 7.9in display boasts a pixel density of 326ppi thanks to a resolution of 2048 x 1536, which is brilliant for watching movies and playing games. The Hudl 2 has a full HD display (1920 x 1200 pixels) amounting to 272ppi. It’s still a great screen though, so you’ll still find that it offers bright, crisp and colourful images, and that bigger display means a bit more screen estate for watching videos.

Hudl 3 vs iPad mini 4 comparison: Specs, hardware and performance

Inside the Hudl 2, you’ll find an Intel Atom quad-core processor clocked at 1.83GHz paired with 2GB RAM. It’s smooth enough to cope with web browsing, responding to emails and running casual games and apps, so if that’s what you’re intending to use your tablet for most then it’s going to be plenty fast enough for you.

The iPad mini 4, on the other hand, is equipped with a super-speedy, 64-bit A8 processor that’ll power even graphics-heavy games and hungry apps.

We’ve get to run benchmark tests on the new iPad mini 4 but when we do, we’ll update this article with the results to find out how they compare with the Hudl 2. However, we’re expecting the iPad mini 4 to blow the Hudl 2 out of the water when it comes to all three of our tests for processor speed, graphics performance and javascript.

However, that can be expected from a device that costs £220 more, and as we’ve mentioned, the Hudl 2 is by no means sluggish.

You’ll find that the Tesco Hudl 2 is only available with 16GB of built-in storage, but it offers a microSD card slot for the ability to add 32GB more for a total of 48GB.

The iPad mini 4 is available with 16GB, 64GB or 128GB, but none of those options offer a microSD card slot so we’d strongly recommend opting for the 64GB model over the 16GB model, as you’ll soon use that space up if you plan on downloading apps or storing movies on there.

When it comes to connectivity, the Hudl 2 has a miniHDMI port for connecting to your TV, Bluetooth 4.0, 802.11 WiFi and GPS.

The iPad mini 4 doesn’t have a miniHDMI, but it does offer faster Bluetooth and WiFi, at Bluetooth 4.2 and 802.11ac respectively. It also has 3G/4G connectivity (although that comes at a cost as demonstrated in the price section of this comparison), which isn’t an option with the Hudl 2 so you’ll only be able to access the internet when WiFi is available.

The iPad mini 4 also has the additional Touch ID fingerprint sensor beneath the home button for extra security. It can be used to unlock the iPad itself, or as an alternative to passwords for some apps.

You’re looking at a longer battery life with the iPad mini 4 too, at up to 10 hours (possibly more with the introduction of the more efficient and battery friendly iOS 9) compared with 8 hours for the Hudl 2.

Onto cameras now, of which both tablets offer two, one on the front and one on the back. The Hudl 2’s cameras are actually pretty great for the price tag. On the back is a 5Mp snapper and the front-facing camera is 1.2Mp.

The iPad mini 4 also has a 1.2Mp camera on the front, but the rear-facing camera is 8Mp.

Hudl 2 vs iPad mini 4 comparison: Software

The Hudl 2 is an Android tablet that runs Android 4.4 KitKat, which is a bit of a shame because that’s since been replaced by 5.0 Lollipop and now 6.0 Marshmallow. However, we do like that Tesco hasn’t messed about with the user interface too much, keeping it reasonably vanilla.

The iPad mini 4 runs the brand new iOS 9, which you can find out more about by following the links below.

How to downgrade from iOS 9 to iOS 8

How to get iOS 9 on your iPhone, iPad and iPod touch

We still think that software unlimitedly comes down to personal preference. You’ll probably already know whether you prefer Android or iOS, but the iPad mini 4 does get you the most up to date software available while the Hudl 2’s is quite old.

Specs Tesco Hudl 2: Specs

Android 4.4 KitKat

8.3in Full HD (1920×1200)

Intel Atom quad-core processor

16GB storage

microSD (up to 32GB)

5Mp rear camera

1.2Mp front camera

Dual-band Wi-Fi

Stereo speakers

8 hour battery life



Iphone 6 Vs Oneplus 2: Hands

Today we’re comparing Apples to Oranges. Well not really, but instead Apple’s iPhone 6 to OnePlus’s new flagship killer on the block. Question is, does the OnePlus 2 bring enough to the table in order to take on one of the most popular smartphones on the planet?

Apple’s iPhone 6 may be nearly one year old, but that doesn’t mean anything in terms of performance with iOS. On the Android side of things, the OnePlus 2 features a Snapdragon 810 processor and 4GB of RAM, which makes the iPhone’s dual-core processor and 1GB seem kiddish, but both devices perform with ease.

We have two very different smartphone designs. Apple’s iPhone 6 is made up from all aluminum with a seamless metal and glass design, but like the OnePlus 2 there’s no removable battery or Micro SD card expansion. The OnePlus 2 features an improved build this time around, using a solid aluminum frame and keeps the same magnesium composition internally.

It initially ships with a Sandstone black back cover, but these can be swapped out for any of the various StyleSwap covers available. On the flip side, you can’t really personalize iPhone style outside of the Silver, Gold, and Space Gray colors offered by Apple.

Check out our OnePlus 2 vs iPhone 6 video below:

On the bottom side of each device we’ll find speaker grilles and microphones, but the OnePlus 2 features a USB Type-C connection port, while Apple’s iPhone 6 sports its proprietary Lightning connector. Apple’s iPhone 6 features NFC, but it’ll really only be useful for Apple Pay.

Also, be sure to check out our OnePlus 2 unboxing and hands-on or our comparison to the OnePlus One.

Buttons between these two are somewhat similar. Apple’s iPhone has a lock button on one side, with volume buttons and a mute switch on the other side. The OnePlus 2 features a volume rocker and lock button on one side and an Alert Slider which functions similarly to the iPhone’s mute switch on the other side and allows you to switch between various alert modes in Android.

If you’re into small(er) smartphones, you may appreciate the 4.7-inch display on the iPhone 6, but its resolution is capped out at 750 x 1334. Over on the OnePlus 2 you’ll find a 5.5-inch display with a resolution of 1080 x 1920, but you’re also dealing with a much larger device here.

On the bottom end of the iPhone 6 you’ll find Apple’s signature home button with a built-in Touch ID fingerprint sensor. This can be used to unlock the device, input passwords, or even authorize mobile payments through Apple Pay. OnePlus included a fingerprint sensor this year centered at the bottom of the front panel, but with no NFC it won’t be used with Android Pay. On each side of that new capacitive fingerprint sensor/home button are two other buttons for back and multitasking.

As for camera performance, this may be somewhat subjective, but there’s definitely a difference in megapixel count with the iPhone 6 coming in with 8 of them and up to 1080p video recording, while the OnePlus 2 features a 13-megapixel shooter with optical image stabilization and laser auto focus. I’ve put together a OnePlus 2 photo gallery you can find here, or check out our iPhone 6 review for photo samples to compare.

FTC: We use income earning auto affiliate links. More.

Samsung Galaxy Buds 2 Pro Vs Galaxy Buds 2: What’S The Difference?

Samsung’s catalog contains both Pro and non-Pro versions of the Galaxy Buds 2, but these earbuds have a lot in common. It might seem like Samsung is competing against itself. As it turns out, the Samsung Galaxy Buds 2 Pro and Galaxy Buds 2 have a few key differences despite the confusingly similar names. We’ll compare these Galaxy Buds to find out which earbuds make the most sense for you.

Samsung Galaxy Buds 2 Pro vs Galaxy Buds 2: At a glance

The Samsung Galaxy Buds 2 Pro are $80 more expensive than the Galaxy Buds 2.

The Samsung Galaxy Buds 2 Pro earbuds have an IPX7 rating, while the Galaxy Buds 2 have an IPX2 water-resistance rating.

The Samsung Galaxy Buds 2 Pro support 360 Audio with head tracking, while the Galaxy Buds 2 lack head tracking.

The Samsung Galaxy Buds 2 will sound better to most listeners out of the box than the Galaxy Buds 2 Pro.

The Samsung Galaxy Buds 2 and Buds 2 Pro share the same overall shape and design. Both are small, roughly oval earbuds with silicone ear tips. The Buds 2 have a slightly more pronounced stem compared to the Pro model. Some may feel the glossy finish looks cheaper, but it’s less of a dust magnet than the matte finish of the Buds 2 Pro.

Samsung says the Galaxy Buds 2 Pro are 15% smaller than the original Galaxy Buds Pro, and they have better airflow. Just like the Buds Pro, the Buds 2 Pro have an IPX7 rating. In addition to surviving your sweaty workouts, these Galaxy Buds may survive a plunge into water for up to 30 minutes. The Buds 2, in contrast, only have an IPX2 rating, meaning they can only deal with some light spraying water. Neither charging case is water resistant.

The Buds 2 Pro abandon all shiny surfaces and, in turn, are a bit easier to grip.

The jewelry box-inspired charging cases work identically with the earbuds. You can charge them with a USB-C cable or on top of a Qi wireless mat. Samsung phone owners can even charge the Galaxy Buds cases on top of their devices with Wireless PowerShare. You need to enable this from your device before setting the case on top of it.

Both of these are Samsung earbuds and hence are designed to work best with Samsung Galaxy devices. Don’t let that scare you off, though: these are still great earbuds for Android phones. You’ll just miss out on a few features here and there, like auto device switching, spatial audio and head tracking, and Samsung’s proprietary audio codecs.

Apps: Samsung Galaxy Wearable and SmartThings

The Samsung Galaxy Wearable app (Android) is where all of the magic happens. Here, you can customize the touch controls and choose your favorite EQ presets. From the app, you can also turn on ambient mode and enable Gaming Mode for lower latency. An ear tip test is also available for both models and does a pretty good job of determining how well the buds fit inside your ears. You’ll also want the app to enable 360 Audio from a Samsung device.

On the Galaxy Buds 2 Pro, SmartThings Find will let you know if you leave your buds behind, even if they’re offline. This app is pre-installed on your Samsung phone.

Samsung 360 Audio features

Robert Triggs / Android Authority

You can experience Samsung 360 Audio from the Samsung Galaxy Buds 2 Pro and Buds 2, but only the Pro earbuds have head tracking. Why does this matter? Well, if you don’t care about spatial audio it doesn’t. However, if you’re a big TV or movie watcher, 360 Audio can really enhance your experience. Just make sure you’re viewing Dobly Atmos content from a compatible service like Disney Plus or HBO Max.

The Samsung Galaxy Buds 2 Pro have another trick up their sleeve: 360 Audio recording. When paired with a Samsung phone that supports LE Audio and runs One UI 5.0+, the Galaxy Buds 2 Pro mics will record 360 Audio sound. This makes it easier than ever for creators to play around with immersive audio.


Both the Galaxy Buds 2 Pro and the Galaxy Buds 2 feature multifunctional touch controls. You can assign certain taps and tap-and-hold actions to modify the noise-cancelling settings or access your preferred smart assistant. When paired to a Samsung phone, just say “Hey, Bixby” to check the weather or send a text.

The Galaxy Buds 2 touch panels are far too sensitive compared to the Buds 2 Pro.

Samsung’s buds have highly sensitive touch panels, and the Buds 2 Pro are the first earbuds to remedy this issue. Yes, that means the Buds 2 will register minor fit adjustments as touch commands, resulting in many accidentally skipped or paused songs.


Sound quality

The Samsung Galaxy Buds 2 Pro sound very good, but are a bit bassy. The chart to the left depicts the Buds 2 Pro’s frequency response in cyan with the SoundGuys Target Curve for reference in pink. SoundGuys, for those not already in the loop, is our audio-focused sister site. Most people won’t mind the extra sub-bass, but it could make it hard to hear vocals during some hip-hop and rap songs.

Both earbuds sound great, but the Buds 2 Pro are a bit bassier than the Buds 2.

The chart on the right depicts the Galaxy Buds 2 frequency response in cyan, and it hews a bit closer to the Target Curve than the Buds 2 Pro. Most general consumers won’t hear a difference unless you prompt them to listen really hard. Suffice it to say, both sets of buds sound very good. If you don’t like the default sound and want to mix it up a bit, you can experiment with Samsung’s numerous EQ presets in the Galaxy Wearable app.

Bluetooth codecs

Regarding Bluetooth codecs, you get AAC and SBC support when connecting to most devices. Samsung Galaxy phone owners can use the Samsung Scalable Codec with the Buds 2 or the Samsung Seamless Codec with the Buds 2 Pro. The Buds 2 Pro support 24-bit audio playback, and the Buds 2 support 24-bit audio playback with UHQ upscaling. We suspect the former isn’t lossless 24-bit because of Bluetooth’s bandwidth limitations.

Galaxy Buds 2 Pro, ANC on: Four hours, 50 minutes.

Galaxy Buds 2, ANC on: Five hours, three minutes.

The earbuds on both models are rated at around 61mAh, but the Buds 2 charging case is 472mAh, while the Buds 2 Pro charging case is 512mAh, so there will be a slight difference in longevity. Both earbud models let you use wireless Qi charging, Samsung PowerShare, or USB-C to top up the case and buds.

Samsung Galaxy Buds 2 Pro:

Lightning: $129

Samsung Galaxy Buds 2:

Lightning charging case: $169

MagSafe charging case: $179

The Galaxy Buds 2 originally launched at $149.99; these days, you can get them for around $75-$100. They come in White, Graphite, Olive, Lavender, and Phantom Black.

The Galaxy Buds 2 Pro launched with a $229.99 MSRP, but we’ve seen them go as low as about $180. You can snag them in White, Graphite, or Bora Purple.

Samsung Galaxy Buds 2 Pro vs Galaxy Buds 2: Which should you buy?

The Galaxy Buds 2 Pro offer some welcome refinements to Samsung’s earbuds line, and overall they make for a good pick for most people. Any old Android phone owner can enjoy the great ANC and EQ presets from the Buds 2 Pro. Of course, if you want 360 Audio with head tracking or recording capabilities, you’ll need to pair them with a new Samsung phone. Ultimately, these are premier audio wearables, and the price reflects that.

Budget buyers may want to sidestep the Buds 2 pro and get the Galaxy Buds 2 instead. These can be found for less than $100, making them a far better deal than the Pro option. You still get very good noise-cancelling and great sound quality no matter what kind of Android phone you use.

Which earbuds do you prefer?

148 votes

First, make sure your device runs One UI 5.o or above, and that it supports LE Audio. Then, follow these directions:

Open your Samsung phone’s camera app.

Tap the settings cog in the top left corner.

Tap Advanced video quality.

Toggle 360 audio recording on.

Start recording video while wearing your Galaxy Buds 2 Pro.

The Samsung Galaxy Buds 2 have a $149.99 MSRP. The Samsung Galaxy Buds 2 Pro launched with a $229.99 MSRP. That said, both can now be found cheaper most of the time.

The Samsung Galaxy Buds 2 launched on August 27, 2023. Meanwhile, the Samsung Galaxy Buds 2 Pro launched in 2023, on August 26th.

Technically, and considering the features, yes. That said, everything is relative to your needs and wants. The Samsung Galaxy Buds 2 are still great headphones at a much lower price point. You should also take a look at our list of the best true wireless headphones to see other options.

Yes! Both Galaxy Buds 2 models will work just fine as regular Bluetooth headphones. They’ll work with any device over Bluetooth. That said, some features are exclusive to Samsung handsets.

Samsung Galaxy Buds 2 Pro Vs Sony Wf

Kris Carlon / Android Authority

Many earbuds fulfill the basics, letting you listen to music and make calls. However, the best earbuds take things a step further and provide cutting-edge features and standout build quality. If you want to do more than listen to music, the Samsung Galaxy Buds 2 Pro and Sony WF-1000XM4 are your buds. These earbuds are the very best from Samsung and Sony. In our Samsung Galaxy Buds 2 Pro vs Sony WF-1000XM4 comparison, we’ll find out which buds suit your lifestyle and budget.

Sony’s mobile app works on Android and iOS, while Samsung’s only works on Android.

The Sony WF-1000XM4 have a much longer battery life than the Galaxy Buds 2 Pro.

The Galaxy Buds 2 Pro have better active noise canceling (ANC) than the WF-1000XM4, but the latter block out more high-pitched sounds.

The Galaxy Buds 2 Pro earbuds have an IPX7 water-resistance rating, while the WF-1000XM4 have an IPX4 rating.

The Sony WF-1000XM4 costs $279, and the Galaxy Buds 2 Pro cost $229.

Samsung Galaxy Buds 2 Pro vs Sony WF-1000XM4: Specs

Then you have the Sony Headphones Connect app, which works identically on Android and iOS. With Sony’s app, you may personalize the 360 Reality Audio effect. Remember: the equivalent feature is exclusive to Samsung handsets with the Galaxy Buds 2 Pro. Sony also lets listeners choose between connection stability or streaming quality, yet another thing you don’t get with Samsung’s buds. Lest we forget, Sony’s app supports a five-band custom equalizer. You don’t get a custom EQ with the Galaxy Buds 2 Pro, even if you pair them with a matching smartphone.

We won’t get into the nitty gritty of Bluetooth codecs, but there are differences to address here too. Sony and Samsung’s buds support SBC and AAC, but their higher-quality codec options differ. Samsung’s buds support SSC, and Sony’s buds support LDAC, which works across Android. SSC is exclusive to Samsung devices, and to get 24-bit audio from it, your device needs One UI 4.0 or higher. LDAC, on the other hand, supports 24-bit audio, but in our testing, we found its audio quality fell short.

Samsung’s earbuds work best with Samsung phones, while Sony’s work equally well with Android phones and iPhones.

Furthering the gap between these two sets of earphones is how the WF-1000XM4 use Bluetooth multipoint, while the Galaxy Buds 2 Pro use automatic device switching. Multipoint connectivity works with any Bluetooth device. Thus, Sony’s earbuds can connect to two sources at once. Samsung’s automatic switching requires Samsung devices under the same account. This doesn’t grant simultaneous connections. Both have their merits, but again, Sony takes a more agnostic approach.

Sony’s earbuds cost $50 more than the Galaxy Buds 2 Pro, but paying more gives you a universal listening experience across devices.

Samsung Galaxy Buds 2 Pro vs Sony WF-1000XM4: Noise canceling

If noise canceling is the most important feature to you, get the Galaxy Buds 2 Pro instead of the WF-1000XM4. Samsung’s low-frequency ANC knocks the socks off the WF-1000XM4. I want to stress that both sets of earbuds have top-notch active noise canceling. Samsung’s ANC is just leagues ahead of other ANC earbuds. When I reviewed the Galaxy Buds 2 Pro, the ANC rendered engine roars, and my sputtering A/C unit almost inaudible. Sony’s earbuds hush these same noises, but they can’t keep up with Samsung’s powerful ANC.

While ANC affects all frequencies, it focuses on the lows and mids. Good passive isolation — from properly fitted ear tips — handle the bulk of high-frequency noise. Although Samsung’s ANC is technically more impressive than Sony’s, the WF-1000XM4 ear tips block out the sound of chatter and unpredictable sounds better than the Galaxy Buds 2 Pro.

Samsung Galaxy Buds 2 Pro, ANC on: Four hours, 50 minutes.

Sony WF-1000XM4, ANC on: Seven hours, 43 minutes.

The WF-1000XM4 and Galaxy Buds 2 Pro cases support USB-C and wireless charging. When you enable Wireless PowerShare on your Samsung device, you can charge the Galaxy Buds 2 Pro case atop your phone. This can come in handy if you’re on a plane and in a pinch. Bear in mind: charging your case from your Samsung phone drains the phone’s battery life.

Samsung Galaxy Buds 2 Pro vs Sony WF-1000XM4: Microphone quality

The Galaxy Buds 2 Pro and Sony WF-1000XM4 microphones sound fine in ideal conditions. You’ll notice that Samsung’s mics make voices sound slightly louder than Sony’s. In the WF-1000XM4 demo, the speaker can sound as if they’re standing far away from the mic at times.

Samsung Galaxy Buds 2 Pro microphone demo (Ideal conditions):

Samsung Galaxy Buds 2 Pro microphone demo (Office conditions):

Samsung Galaxy Buds 2 Pro: $229

Sony WF-1000XM4: $279

Samsung Galaxy Buds 2 Pro vs Sony WF-1000XM4: Which earbuds should you buy?

Kris Carlon / Android Authority

The Samsung Galaxy Buds 2 Pro may have the best noise canceling of these two sets of buds, but the Sony WF-1000XM4 are more versatile. Despite their steeper price, the WF-1000XM4 are a better value for listeners with non-Samsung Android devices. If you want to listen to your earbuds unbound by your phone or tablet’s brand, go with the Sony WF-1000XM4. The quiet treble response is easy to fix in the mobile app, and the fit is more comfortable thanks to the memory foam ear tip material.

That said, if you’re completely on board with all things Samsung, the Galaxy Buds 2 Pro are the better buds for you. Pairing the Galaxy Buds 2 Pro to a Samsung device unlocks cutting-edge features like spatial audio playback and recording with compatible handsets. The default sound quality is very good. So good, in fact, that few people will need to play with the Android app’s sound profile presets.

Which earbuds would you prefer?

123 votes

Regardless of which wireless earbuds you go with, you’ll get access to a wealth of features. It’s hard to pick the wrong set of buds here. The decision is really about which buds are more right for your needs.

Galaxy S Iii Vs Lg Optimus Lte 2

Galaxy S III vs LG Optimus LTE 2

There’s a war going on out there between the international smartphone manufacturers, and at this very moment it’s being squared off between Samsung and LG. What we’ve got here are two titans, both of them having been announced just this week to the public for imminent release. The LG Optimus LTE 2 brings on a device with a screen size they’ve not yet revealed made with “True HD” IPS technology – that being more than likely much sharper than what you’ll see on the Galaxy S III, Samsung’s contribution to this equation being a full-on attack with a solid smartphone hardware arrangement and a whole new look at software.

Having a closer look at the LG Optimus LTE 2 we see that they’ve revealed some, but not all of the specifications of the device as it’ll appear in the wild. You’ll find the look to be much more square than the Galaxy S III (which has a nature-themed bit of software inside of a pebble-shaped device), and the LG device will more than likely be released with a dual-core processor along the lines of the Qualcomm Snapdragon S4. The reasoning behind this is that LG has noted that its processing chip will have integrated LTE connectivity. The battery in this device will be a massive 2,150mAh with “40 percent more” usage time for you than the previous LG powerhouse known as the Optimus LTE – also known as the LG Nitro HD.

The most important bit of detail that LG has decided to share thus far on the Optimus LTE 2 is its massive 2GB of RAM. This extra memory will bring what LG says is much higher stability for Android than we’ve ever seen before. Meanwhile the Samsung Galaxy S III will have 1GB of RAM and has certainly shown itself to be as stable as any device we’ve yet laid hands on.

Samsung Galaxy S III hands-on:

[vms 10d9b7e9abed244dd2f2]

The Galaxy S III contains an Exynos quad-core processor, will be working with HSPA+ as well as LTE in different areas of the world, and has a 4.8-inch 720 x 1280 306ppi HD Super AMOLED display up front. The back of the device is plastic (like the LG device) but here has what Samsung calls a “hyperglaze” coating to reduce the likelihood of scratches. This Galaxy device has also had all of its specifications revealed as opposed to next-to-none as it is with the LG device, and we’ve got more information and hands-on experiences for you in our timeline below than you can handle!

The decision between these two devices might be made for you before you even make it as the LG device is likely going to have a much smaller release area than the Samsung Galaxy S III, with the GSIII already being announced to have USA versions appearing perhaps inside 2012. We’ll see soon!

Update the detailed information about Ipad 2 Vs Motorola Xoom on the website. We hope the article's content will meet your needs, and we will regularly update the information to provide you with the fastest and most accurate information. Have a great day!