Trending December 2023 # Meet Intel 7Th Gen Core, The 4K, Vr # Suggested January 2024 # Top 17 Popular

You are reading the article Meet Intel 7Th Gen Core, The 4K, Vr updated in December 2023 on the website We hope that the information we have shared is helpful to you. If you find the content interesting and meaningful, please share it with your friends and continue to follow and support us for the latest updates. Suggested January 2024 Meet Intel 7Th Gen Core, The 4K, Vr

Meet Intel 7th Gen Core, the 4K, VR-ready “Kaby Lake” processors

If we’re post-PC, nobody told Intel: the chip company has higher hopes than ever for the computer – albeit in a range of form-factors – running its new 7th Gen “Kaby Lake” Core processors, officially announced today. With headline 7th Gen vs 6th Gen improvements including swifter, less power-intensive media playback and processing, the ability to do serious gaming on the move, and broader support for next-generation interconnects like Thunderbolt and USB-C plus security features like Windows Hello, Intel sees Kaby Lake as more than just a speed bump.

“At its core the PC is the consummate Darwinian machine,” Navin Shenoy, general manager of the client computing group at Intel, argues. “It’s constantly adapting to the changes around us.”

Just as we’re not entirely sure about the path of animal evolution, mind, neither is the future of the PC quite clear. Intel is betting on its vision of a 4K-obsessed, frequently gaming-on-the-go future, and as with previous chip launches it’s the mobile version of that which is getting fresh silicon first.

Mobile processors spanning the 4.5W to 15W range and targeting 2-in-1s and ultrathin notebooks for both consumers and businesses will arrive first; in fact, the chips are in mass production now, Intel says, and will be made available to manufacturing partners in September.

There are already “hundreds” of designs based on Kaby Lake expected to launch in Q4 2023, according to Chris Walker, general manage row mobile client platforms at Intel.

Come January 2023, meanwhile, there’ll be performance gaming and VR mobile chips, in addition to desktop processors for both consumer and enterprise use, including models supporting vPro. That should open the door for another 350 expected designs to come to market, Intel predicts, across multiple form factors.

On paper, you might question exactly what has changed. Like the 6th Gen chips they’re built on 14nm processes, and indeed the 7th Generation uses the same Skylake architecture, albeit “with enhancements,” Intel says.

It’s those enhancements which will make the difference. There’ll only be a roughly 300-400 MHz clock speed increase, and battery life for mobile products based on the 7th Gen processors will be roughly the same, but Intel claims the overall system is far more efficient.

In fact, there’s a double-digit performance gain in mobile compared to last year, going by Intel’s benchmarks. Year on year, comparing the 6th Gen i7-6500U to the 7th Gen i7-7500U, the company’s tests show a 12-percent improvement in productivity apps and 19-percent in everyday tasks such as browsing, photo editing, and email. That’s down to things like improved interconnect performance, and a claimed 12-percent improvement in efficiency at the transistor level.

Year on year upgraders aren’t where Intel sees the greatest number of customers coming from, however. As before, it’s pulling out research suggesting that most people who’ll be considering a 7th Gen based machine will in fact be upgrading from a five year old PC

There, unsurprisingly, the gains are even more significant. Compared to that five year old PC, a new model with a comparable tier chip should be 1.7x faster at those work tasks, and an incredible 8.6x faster at creating, editing, and sharing 4K UHD and 360 videos.

Looking at a new Core i5-7200U based laptop versus a Core i5-2467M from half a decade ago, the 7th Gen model is 15x faster at creating 4K video highlights. In fact, Intel says, the new chips can do it in nearly real time – figure on around 37 seconds for a 30 second clip, software depending – while converting an hour-long 4K video takes approximately twelve minutes in contrast to 85+ minutes on the old system.

It’s partly down to the new media engine, which Intel built on the Gen9 graphics architecture. There’s a dedicated media engine for video decoding, designed both for power efficiency and supporting parallel engines for greater performance throughput. Everyday users should see the impact in 10-bit HEVC and VP9 video, not to mention power consumption during playback; indeed, Intel predicts around 75-percent better battery life when playing VP9 footage compared to the old chips.

Even how turbo state use is managed will get smarter. Intel will use a broader range of sensor input – including from the accelerometer and thermometers – to figure out the ambient thermal temperature; if you still have headroom for comfortable, safe use, you’ll be able to stay in the turbo state for longer.

There’ll be branding changes, too. For a start, Intel will be labeling the chip badges with “7th Gen”, and there’ll no longer be Core m7 or m5 models: instead, they’ll just be known as Core i5 or Core i7, because Intel argues they don’t sacrifice performance. Initially, the range will include Core m3, Core i3, Core i5, and Core i7 chips.

Meanwhile, Intel expects to see twice the number of designs as before offering Thunderbolt connectivity – 120+ at initial count – and 100+ with Windows Hello support. 50+ of the systems on the roadmap will have 4K UHD displays, and 25+ will support pen input.

Figure on less of a hit in your bag, too, with convertibles as thin as 10mm and clamshells under 10mm. Intel even teased fanless detachables under 7mm thick, and we’ll start to see the first models using Kaby Lake from September and ramping up toward the 2023 holidays.

You're reading Meet Intel 7Th Gen Core, The 4K, Vr

Intel 13Th Gen Raptor Lake Suspected Skus

Intel 13th gen Raptor Lake suspected SKUs 

With the release of Raptor Lake rapidly approaching, we still don’t have any solid information about the CPUs releasing in the 13th generation.

Intel 13th gen Raptor Lake SKUs: Intel’s 13th generation chips are soon to hit the market, but we still don’t have much information about the specific CPUs that comprise the 13th gen. We do have some leaks surrounding the suspected 13900K and 13600K, but outside of that, not much. 

Now read: 13th gen Raptor Lake, what we know. 

13th gen Raptor Lake 

Intel’s 13th generation of CPUs have been dubbed ‘Raptor Lake’ and are more of a subtle improvement over Alder Lake, Intel’s 12th generation CPUs. 

Raptor Lake is going to retain the same socket compatibility as the 12th gen, meaning it will fit your LGA 1700 motherboard. Intel promised to keep LGA 1700 going for a couple of years after Alder Lake was released because we think even avid Intel enthusiasts are tired of changing sockets so often. 

Raptor lake is designed around Intel’s in-house architecture ‘Intel 7’ that’s based on a 10nm process, the issue with this is that AMD’s new Zen 4 architecture is based upon a 5nm process. The smaller the ‘nm process’, the higher the IPC (instructions per core), and the better the performance. 

Raptor lake will be based on the same model as Alder lake for the most part, with the same Greacemont core architecture being used for its efficiency cores. But this time around, Intel has updated the performance core architecture. The new P-core architecture has been updated from Golden Cove to Raptor Cove. 

Raptor lake SKUs 

Now we’re going to use historical data and snippets of the latest news to speculate on what SKUs may be hitting the market first when Intel’s 13th gen Raptor Lake releases. 


We know there’s going to be a 13900K as we’ve seen some performance benchmarks leaked in the last few days. Check out our 13900K CPU-z leak article to learn more. 

The 13900K will be the 13th generation flagship, assuming Intel doesn’t release a 13900KS when AMD releases its Zen 4 3D CPUs later on in 2023. 

We could apparently see boost speeds of up to 5.8GHz on the 13900K according to this article from Wccftech. That’s a 0.3GHz boost over the 12th gen Alder Lake flagship, the 12900K. 


Again, leaks have surfaced lately surrounding the i7-13700K and its performance, such as this one from VideoCardz. 

Only this time, the 13700K will have a 5.2GHz boost speed, not too far off from that of the 12900K. And the new leaks suggest that the 13700k could have a base core frequency of around 3.4GHz. 

This CPU was tested on a DDR5 motherboard, so we don’t yet know the DDR4 frequency any of the 13th gen CPUs will support as a baseline. However, we do know that 13th gen CPUs will support DDR4. 


According to this article on PCGamer, the i5-13600K looks like one powerful chip. We think that the 13600K could be the sweet spot for ‘price to performance’ for the 13th generation. 

The engineering sample in the leak had slightly lower clock speeds than the expected 13600K, but the real deal should have all core boost speeds of up to 4.9GHz and all cores of up to 5.1GHz. The base core frequencies are not yet known. 

Final word 

That’s about it for our Intel 13th gen Raptor Lake SKUs article. Intel is building something great here, and although the expected performance increase over Alder Lake is said to be limited, we like the look for the 13th gen so far. And can’t wait to see how it stacks up against AMD’s new Zen 4 CPUs in September. We will update this article as we get more information about the chips within Raptor Lake. 

Intel Core I7 13700K Vs Ryzen 9 7900X

Intel Core i7 13700K vs Ryzen 9 7900X 

Stuck between AMD and Intel? We’re analysing every CPU from the new generations and pitting them off head to head, today we’re looking at the 13700K vs 7900X.

Intel released its 13th-generation CPUs into the wild on October 20th, 2023. The 13th generation is said to be the best that intel has ever produced. Even going as far as to promise a 6GHz later on in 2023. For now, let’s focus on the here and now, here’s our 13700K vs 7900X article.  

Now Read: Ryzen 9 7900X review

Buy a 13th-generation CPU here:

Before we jump into it, we have to get a grasp of each CPUs specifications. This will help us take a look at each CPU comparatively, and help us deduce which one is better on paper, the 13700K or the 7900X. You have to take into account your use case too, ours may differ from yours.

13700K vs 7900X: Specifications 

Here we will run through the specifications of each CPU to help us determine which is best based on specs alone. 


The specifications of the Core i7-13700K are as follows: 

Cores: P-cores 8 / E-cores 8

Base clock frequency: P-cores 3.4 GHz / E-cores 2.5 GHz

Boost clock frequency: P-cores 5.4 GHz / E-cores 4.2 GHz

L3 cache: 24MB

Default TDP: 125 W / 253 W boost.

iGPU: Intel UHD graphics 770

Ryzen 9 7900X

AMD Ryzen 9 7900X




Base speed


Boost speed



L3 64MB



The Ryzen 9 7900X is the second-best CPU in AMD’s 700 series CPUs designed to bring power and efficiency to all gamers. The 7900X brings fantastic gaming performance and also has the core and thread counts to perform some heavy workstation tasks. 

The specifications of the Ryzen 9 7900X are as follows. 

Cores: 12

Base clock speed: 4.7GHz

Boost clock speed: 5.6GHz

L3 Cache: 64MB

TDP: 170W

iGPU: RDNA 2-based Radeon Graphics

Things to consider when opting for a 13700K or a 7900X

Here are the things to consider when choosing between these two CPUs. 

Obviously, both of these CPUs have very different sockets, however, the point lies within each of the CPUs separately. 

The Ryzen 9 7900X belongs to socket AM5, this is the first socket change AMD has undergone in over five years. This means you’ll need a brand-new motherboard to support the new 7000 series CPU. But with the Intel CPU, it’s a different story. 

The 13700k belongs to socket LGA 1700, which has been Intel’s socket of choice since Alder lake, this does not require you to update your motherboard if you’re already on socket LGA 1700. 

13700K vs 7900X: Specification comparison 

Here we will compare the specifications of both CPUs, this will give us a better understanding of how CPUs work and all the things to look out for that make a CPU “better”. 

CPU cores are what comprises your CPU, the more cores your CPU has the better it can perform. Having a larger number of CPU cores means your CPU will be better at multitasking natively, as it has more cores capable of processing instructions. 

Core speed 

The 7900X has a much faster core boost speed of 5.6GHz. 

Core speed is an important metric when considering a CPU, as it’s the speed at which a CPU core can complete an instruction cycle. 5.6GHz is 5.6 Billion times per second. 

A CPU instruction cycle is comprised of three major actions, these are: fetch, decode, and execute. It’s these three actions that comprise the fundamentals of computing as we know it. The faster a CPU core can complete these cycles, the more cycles it can rack up in one second. This translates directly to more instructions or “actions processed”. 

A higher CPU core speed is beneficial, especially to gaming performance, as games often only rely on one to four cores. 


The Ryzen 9 7900X has a larger CPU cache. 

A CPU cache is a type of volatile memory that’s constructed close to the CPU cores, this is to improve latency and facilitate high-speed transfers. CPU cache acts as a buffer between system memory and the CPUs. and as the cache is much faster than system memory, it allows the more efficient feeding of CPU cores with instructions. Helping the CPU to process faster. 


The Ryzen 9 7900X has a lower TDP of 170W / 230W

TDP stands for thermal design power and is the maximum amount of thermal energy a component can produce under normal operating conditions. 

There are two types of TDP, base TDP and boost TDP. These values represent the amount of thermal energy given off by the CPUs running at both the base and boost speeds. As you can see, the Ryzen 9 7900X is more efficient, creating less heat with a lower TDP. 

TDPs have to be “counteracted” by coolers, you need to negate all that thermal energy, by moving it away from the CPU as fast as possible, you’re going to need a beefy cooler to handle both CPUs. 

13700K vs 7900X: Performance 

Although we won’t have the actual numbers until the 13th gen CPUs release, we do have a snippet of info given at the latest Intel Innovation event by Intel CEO Pat Gelsinger. 

Where to buy Intel 13th generation CPUs

Sold on the latest Intel 13th generation CPUs? here’s where to buy the entire 13th-generation CPU lineup!

Final Word 

We hope you enjoyed this Core i9-13700K vs Ryzen 9 7900X article, and we hope it helps you to make future comparisons when it next comes time to upgrade your CPU. 

Another Intel 11Th Gen Cpu Benchmark Has Been Spotted

Even though Intel’s 10th generation CPU offerings haven’t been out for too long, that hasn’t stopped benchmarks appearing for the upcoming 11th generation processors dubbed “Rocket Lake-S”.

Late last month we covered some of the first benchmarks spotted for the upcoming Rocket Lake-S processors. These came from serial leakers TUM_APISAK and _rogame who shared findings of the leaked 6 core, 12 thread processor. This leak pointed towards a processor with a base clock of 3.5 GHz and a boost clock of 4.2 GHz.

We now have further information concerning the 11th generation lineup that includes benchmarks from an 8 core, 16 thread processor.

What To Expect From Intel’s Rocket Lake-S Processors

Before we move on to the leaks, let’s just go through some of the cliff notes of what we could expect from this upcoming generation of processors. Intel’s 11th generation of processors will be the next release that will use the LGA1200 socket. This means that users who have recently upgraded their motherboard won’t have to worry.

With the 10th Gen Comet Lake CPUs being PCIe Gen3 only, it’s safe to say that Rocket Lake will support PCIe Gen4 – something that a few Z490 motherboards thankfully already support.

Intel Rocket Lake-S will also be the first CPU architecture to support the upcoming Xe graphics engine. There have been rumors that this graphics processor will be similar to the Gen12 design that we will see in the upcoming Tiger Lake series, which should give us an idea of performance closer to their release.

What Do These New Leaks Show?

These new benchmarks spotted on Geekbench appear to show an 8 core, 16 thread processor with a base clock of 3.2 GHz, and a boost clock of 4.3 GHz. It’s strange to see that the base clock is lower than we saw on the previous 6 core leak, but that could all be down to the fact this is likely another early engineering sample.

The boost clock speed is a little higher than we saw in the 6 core leak, clocking in 200 MHz higher than the first sample. We can also see some information on the Xe graphics clock speed from this leak, which points towards it being 1.15 GHz. As well as this, are 32 EUs on this chip which results in a total of 256 Unified cores. This is a lot lower than we’ve seen from leaks concerning Intel’s first discrete graphics card, the DG1. This is expected to have 96 EUs and a total of 768 cores.

In an OpenCL benchmark, the Xe graphics found in this Rocket Lake-S chip scores 6266 points. It has been noted that this is actually a slower speed than we can currently find in the UHD 630 from the Core i7-10700K processor which scores 6360 points.

It looks like there will be a lot more work done on this chip in the coming months, so we wouldn’t worry too much about the speeds just yet. It could be the case that Intel is focusing more on the release of the Tiger Lake lineup as they ship out sooner and then passing some of the final optimizations upwards to the Rocket Lake platform.

Meet Robbox, The Robot That Schleps A Half

French Special Forces former operative General Luc Beaussant has first-hand experience soldiering under the weight of these incredibly heavy packs. Now retired from the military, he’s the managing director of a small company, Sera Ingénierie, that recently won the robotics prize for its Robbox mule at the biennial SOFINS (Special Operations Forces Innovation Network Seminar) held near Bordeaux, in western France. 

The idea behind Robbox was to lighten the load for special forces, but “it had to be a solution, not an extra thing for them to worry about,” Beaussant says. So the technology needed to be kept simple. “Lessons learned with the two prototypes designed over the past seven years show that if the technology is too complex, then the reliability is compromised.” 

The Robbox vehicle looks like a 1,500 lb 4×4 wheeled jeep without a roof. It’s about 5 ft wide, 11 ft long, and can carry 1,100 lbs of mission modules. These modules can be integrated on the roughly 8 ft by 4 ft platform and in the approximately 5 ft x 4 ft x 2 ft space underneath the platform between the wheels. Its task is to carry cargo in different forms. The flat platform can also be equipped with a stretcher to rapidly evacuate a wounded soldier, making it similar in concept to this robot the US Marines have been testing.

[Related: This robotic stretcher could transport wounded Marines off future battlefields]

But Robbox only needs to use its own engines once the mission is underway. To reach the mission hotspot, “Robbox has the unique capacity amongst its competitors of being towable, just like a trailer, at up to 50 mph, all day if necessary, then automatically unhook so that nobody needs to risk getting out of the towing vehicle,” Beaussant explains. Robbox can also be transported inside aircraft or large helicopters or be air-lifted by the medium-sized NH90 helicopter used by 10 European nations, New Zealand, Oman, and Qatar.

So when it has reached the hotspot, its fuel capacity is totally dedicated to the mission “and given its payload capacity it can also carry extra fuel tanks if necessary,” Beaussant adds.

The robotic mule can either be piloted from a distance or follow waypoints. It is also being taught to follow a road or a person. 

[Related: The Air Force’s new guard dogs are robots]

Romain Le Berre, sales director at Nexter Robotics, the company developing the command and control systems for Robbox (and others), tells Popular Science that the robot has some image-recognition abilities, thanks to machine learning. “For the moment it can recognize the difference between an adult and a child but not between a man and a woman or a person carrying a gun and a person carrying a spade, but that will come in time,” he says. (The idea here is that Robbox will be able to electronically report back to its operator that “there is a man on my route and he is carrying a gun.” The operator will then decide what to do with that information, not Robbox.) Le Berre explains that it could follow the edge of a road, for example, “but if the road has been damaged by a shell, that might confuse it.”

In addition to the minimum of six cameras Robbox needs to “see,” it also has LiDAR that emits pulsed light waves around the vehicle. These pulses bounce off surrounding objects and return to the sensor and by measuring the time it takes for each pulse to return, the sensor calculates the distance to the object. This is repeated millions of times per second to create a real-time 3D image of the environment around the vehicle.

Sera Ingénierie is currently working on the final details of the third version of Robbox which Beaussant hopes will be ready by June 2023 for Eurosatory, the major European land and air-land show in Paris. And he also hopes to be able to submit it in answer to an expected call for tender by the French Army for route-clearing robots. But meanwhile the second version will be evaluated in September by the French Army’s equipment test center, the STAT (Section Technique de l’Armée de Terre), for use as a perimeter guard to do rounds instead of a human with a dog.

Amd Vs Intel – What Are The Main Differences?

The biggest rivalry in the CPU market is the decades-long war between Intel and AMD, and from our perspective, this battle could go on for another 10 years or more as the computing market requires faster processors. It’s very important for both home and business computer users to have a fast-enough processor because it’s the brain that keeps everything moving. Without a CPU, your computer is just a useless shell, and no one wants that lying around.

Intel vs AMD

Both giants in the form of AMD and Intel, have been competing at the highest level for a very long time, so, which one is better than the other? This post broadly compares Intel CPU with AMD processors for performance, gaming, overclocking, pricing, etc.

We should point out that both AMD and Intel work on the same x86 architecture, which is why all your Windows 10 apps tend to work the same no matter which branded processor is inside the system.

For those who are wondering, AMD can create x86 chips mainly due to a past technology exchange agreement with Intel. At the time, AMD was merely a second-source supplier for Intel, but things changed in 1991 when the company decided to create its own chips based on the x86 platform and compete directly with its former partner. The processor was called the Am386, and it was a clone of the Intel 80386. AMD didn’t have a huge success with that processor, but as we can tell, the company went on to do very well for itself over the decades.


When purchasing a new microprocessor, performance should be one of the first things that come to mind. First, you should determine what you need the performance for. Is it for work, gaming, or a little bit of both?

Now, if you want to game but you’re on a budget, then chances are it would be too expensive to purchase a processor along with a dedicated GPU. Yes, several Intel-based processors come with discrete graphics, but these aren’t powerful enough for gaming at all.

The folks at AMD decided to change the entire game with the launch of the Ryzen 5 2400G. It comes packed with a discrete Vega 11 graphics performance.

As it stands, then, a low budget gamer should consider investing in an AMD product because they give the best performance to price ratio.

For those who can afford the tech with the most performance, then Intel comes out on top in this regard. Still, AMD brings to the table better multi-threading performance due to more cores and thread count.

If we look at the Intel Core i9 and the AMD Threadripper, which are the top consumer chips from both companies, it’ clear that both are quality, but the Intel has the edge where raw performance is concerned.

CPU Overclocking

This is where things get interesting, especially in Intel’s favor, and this has been the case for many years. You see, if you’re looking to get the best overclocking performance from your computer processor, then Intel is your best bet.

We believe it has everything to do with Intel’s more sophisticated hyperthreading and turbo-boost technology. AMD isn’t far behind, of course, especially with Ryzen, but the ball is still in Intel’s court at this time.

Who has the better graphics card?

It’s easy to answer that question since AMD has several dedicated graphics cards on the market and Intel does not. It’s very important to point out that to get to this level, AMD had to acquire ATI in the past, where Intel is trying to get there on its own.

Over the years, we’ve heard rumors of Intel acquiring NVIDIA, but nothing of the sort has since materialized, and we doubt it’ll ever happen. Now, the company is conjuring up its line of dedicated cards, but we’re not fully certain when these will hit the market.

Intel says it’s planning for 2023 release, so that’s a year from now. We’re not sure how well Intel’s dedicated graphics card technology is coming along and whether or not it’ll have the performance needed to give NVIDIA and AMD a run for their money.

One thing is for certain; Intel will have to sell these dedicated GPUs at a price that is cheaper than rivals if they want to attract gamers who are very loyal.

So, as it stands, Intel is well behind, and it shows because the company has decided to use AMD’s graphics cards with its high-end H-Series mobile processors. Certainly, this won’t be forever, but for now, it’s a good thing because consumers will likely see the rise of thinner gaming laptops.

We understand that this is made possible due to the use of Embedded Multi-Die Interconnect Bridge (EMIB), but since none of these Intel-powered devices have hit the market as of yet, it’s difficult to tell how they would stack up against a similar AMD set up.

AMD or Intel for Gaming

In terms of which processor is better for gaming, well, it’s all subjective. However, the Intel processors have been well designed with gaming in mind, and it shows in the overall performance.

AMD, on the other hand, is definitely no slouch, especially now with Ryze in play. However, many games have been optimized to get the most out of Intel CPUs, which is the main reason why Intel has the edge right now.

At the same time, AMD is the king where gaming consoles are concerned. Both the Xbox One and the PlayStation 4 are powered by AMD, and that’s due to the company’s APU (Accelerated Processing Unit).


This is one of the areas both AMD, and Intel differ, and even now, nothing much has changed. You see, Intel has always been known as the company that creates premium processors, and rightfully so.

For a very long time, Intel stood at the top with the best processors for work and gaming. AMD wasn’t significantly behind, of course, but the company tends to fail at delivering on promises made when it comes down to performance.

Because of this, then, pricing has always been in AMD’s favor. However, things have changed a great deal since the launch of the Bulldozer series of CPUs. In the year 2023, AMD launched Ryzen; an guess what? It’s the best family of processors the company has ever come up with.

Not only are they fast, but still cheaper than what Intel has to offer. Finally, Intel is getting some long and needed competition, and that bodes well for consumers.

Best bang for your buck

During daily routines, two similar AMD and Intel processors from the top-end won’t perform radically different from one another. However, if you’re gaming or planning to edit videos, then that’s where you should take deep consideration into which processor setup you should go with.

For gaming with a dedicated graphics card, we’d take Intel over AMD any day, but when it comes down to heavy video editing and the use f applications that require heavy multithreading, an AMD chip could be the best choice due to having more cores.

From our point of view, AMD tends to offer better performance to price ratio via the mid and low-end spectrum of the market, and that does include gaming.

If you do not have a lot of money to spend, then an AMD setup makes a lot of sense, but if you have the cash to throw around, then look to what Intel has to offer and leave your friends in awe with your computer’s impressive performance.

Your take?

Update the detailed information about Meet Intel 7Th Gen Core, The 4K, Vr on the website. We hope the article's content will meet your needs, and we will regularly update the information to provide you with the fastest and most accurate information. Have a great day!