Trending March 2024 # Moto E Vs Intex Aqua I5 Mini [In # Suggested April 2024 # Top 8 Popular

You are reading the article Moto E Vs Intex Aqua I5 Mini [In updated in March 2024 on the website We hope that the information we have shared is helpful to you. If you find the content interesting and meaningful, please share it with your friends and continue to follow and support us for the latest updates. Suggested April 2024 Moto E Vs Intex Aqua I5 Mini [In

For those who didn’t yet met the Moto E, it was launched by the Motorola company with decent features at a remarkable price tag. This little smartphone running KitKat OS launched at a mind-blowing  INR 6999 price tag. This surely depicts that Motorola is striving hard to offer its users, quality devices at affordable prices for all ranges. And looking at the sales of these devices, it is sure that this plan is working for Motorola.

Today we are doing an in-depth comparison between the Moto E and Intex Aqua i5 Mini. So let’s get going now !!!


Moto E

The Moto E’s rear panel is curved and is made of a soft polycarbonate shell, which is comfortable to hold. The front panel sports two speaker grilles on top and bottom with a chrome tone. Moto E comes with curvy edges and chunky looks. The phone with the dimensions 124.8 x 64.8 x 12.3 mm weighs 142 gms and feels comfortable in hand. The device is a bit thick in this era of slim phones though. However for the sub $130 device, the thickness and size are never the biggest concerns.

Intex Aqua i5 Mini

The Intex Aqua i5 Mini comes in white color and mostly made of plastic except for the back shell covering the battery which is metallic coated. The rears bears the Camera and LED flash at the back and the speaker at the bottom and on the front we have three capacitive touch buttons for navigation. The device has the dimensions of 135 x 67.4 x 9.5 mm, and weighs 140 grams which is pretty sleek for a budget device. But the screen to device ratio is a bit less which is common for local branded devices.

Moto E offers a high quality poly carbonate shell which is quite preferable to the Aqua i5 mini’s plastic shell which looks glossy and attracts a lot of fingerprints. The Aqua device get an upper hand on thickness factor, as Moto E is a bit bulky for this generation. The weight of both the devices is comparable, so win-win for both considering the weight factor. But Moto E has compact build design and quality, and has a better screen to device ration compared to Intex Aqua i5 Mini which bears low quality glossy plastic.

So it’s gonna be Moto E that takes this round on Intex Aqua i5 Mini.

Winner: Moto E


Moto E

The Moto E sports a 4.3 inch Capacitive touch screen with a 540 x 960 pixel resolution which brings the pixel density to 256 ppi which is great for a budget device. The display offers fairly well saturated colors and good contrast. Motorola has used Corning Gorilla Glass 3 on the new Moto E, which protects it from scratches. This feature gives an edge to Moto E over other devices in its range. The viewing angles are great for normal usage and display is bright enough for daily usage.

Intex Aqua i5 Mini

Moto E comes with a qHD display and a Corning Gorilla Glass 3 for protection is definitely the best display you’ll get on an $129 device. Moto E has definitely an edge over Intel Aqua i5 Mini which has slightly bigger display size but with less resolution which will definitely not impress the most. So Moto E takes over the Intel Aqua i5 Mini in the Display section as well.

Winner: Moto E


Moto E

Moto E packs a 5.0 MP camera, but lacks LED flash support as well as front camera. The camera is good for capturing few pics every now and then but it is not great for serious camera junkies. It will suffice the purpose of regularly posting pictures on social networking sites though. The camera cannot be used in low light conditions and HDR option is also not available on Moto E which is available on Moto G. Camera is one of the few downsides of this device, but is an inevitable strategy the company should take for cost cutting.

Intex Aqua i5 Mini

Intex Aqua i5 Mini packs an 8 MP camera with flash support along with a 2 MP front-facing camera for video calling. The camera sports all the basic mojo like touch-to-focus, geo-tagging etc. The specs are great on paper, but it’s not possible to decide on the picture quality and others factors without laying hand on it. But considering the previous devices from the company which featured the same camera modules, we believe that the device offers a decent performance.

Though we don’t know how the Intex Aqua i5 mini performs with its 8 MP camera, but we firmly believe that it’s going to be above average and satisfy the needs of budget user. Moto E’s 5 MP camera has not been that great and the lack of LED flash further limits its functionality to well  lit conditions. So Intex Aqua i5 Mini takes the camera section with more camera pixels (Remember, more pixels doesn’t mean more clarity but it can outperform the Moto E’s camera) and the inclusion on LED flash light as well as front-facing camera.

Winner: Intex Aqua i5 Mini


Moto E

Moto E comes with the latest version of android i.e KitKat 4.4.2. The android interface is pretty much close to stock and user can experience pure vanilla flavor in their hands. The device comes with a few preloaded apps though like Motorola Assist for intelligent control options and Motorola Migrate that makes moving from older device easier. It also comes with Motorola Alert, an app that is designed to share your location with your friends and family.

Intex Aqua i5 Mini

Moto E offers the pure Vanilla flavor of the android and also provides the latest KitKat OS while the Intex Aqua i5 Mini comes with the custom-themed OS and runs on Android 4.2.2 Jellybean which is outdated. However, the themed based UI is one notable feature of Intex, but it’s just another method of customizing your Android. Most Android lovers love the vanilla flavor of Android rather than customized OS which will use considerable amount of system’s resources. So Moto E beats Intex Aqua i5 Mini with the latest and Pure Android interface.

Winner: Moto E


Moto E

The Moto E features a dual-core Qualcomm Snapdragon 200 processor, clocked at 1.2 GHz, and is backed up by the Adreno 302 GPU and 1 GB of RAM. The device offers a decent hardware for a low cost device. The device can perform all basic tasks like web browsing, Video streaming etc.., but understandably it struggles with processor intensive apps and multitasking. But it isn’t that bad, you can even play Asphalt 8 with minor frame drops.

Intex Aqua i5 Mini

Intex Aqua i5 Mini house a Quad-core MediaTek MT6582 which is clocked at 1.3 GHz and is backed up by Mali 400 GPU and 1 GB of RAM. The Quad core processor is good considering the price tag. The device can do some heavy lifting with the Quad core processor and 1 GB RAM and can seamlessly get along with the multitasking. A dedicated GPU can always come in handy when playing graphic intensive games.

This section gets really tougher to decide between the processors from Snapdragon and Mediatek. Before we start, we want you to know that more cores doesn’t mean more power, the architecture of the cores also play a major role in the device’s performance. Mediatek chipsets are known for their powerful cores and comes cheap but they lack intensive graphical support, so they have to rely on GPU, while Snapdragon processors are known for their balanced performance between graphics and processing power.

Considering the chipsets, the Quad core Mediatek processor would easily take on the Snapdragon 200 processor in terms of performance and the support of Mali 400 GPU gives upper hand to Aqua i5 Mini over the Moto E.

Winner: Intex Aqua i5 Mini


Moto E

Moto E comes with a 4GB internal storage onboard, out of which just 2.2 GB is available to the user and the rest is occupied by the Operating System and apps. But Moto E is provided with a Micro SD slot through which you can expand your storage up to 32 GB. You can transfer most of the apps and multimedia files to the SD card to free up your device.

Intex Aqua i5 Mini

Storage wise both the devices have similar specs, so we call it even in this section. So it’s a tie.

Winner: It’s a tie.


Moto E

Moto E comes with a non-removable Li-Ion 1980 mAh battery which can easily last for a day at normal usage, considering the specs of the device. So no need of carrying the charger wherever you go.

Intex Aqua i5 Mini

The battery of the Moto E is better compared to the battery of Intel Aqua i5 Mini. Both the devices have a non-removable battery so you can’t switch batteries which is a drawback. So we are considering only the onboard battery power, Moto E emerges as the Winner.

Winner: Moto E


Looking at the in depth review of both the devices, it is a tough call to declare a winner. Intex Aqua i5 Mini clearly sweeps Moto E in the camera and Processor sections while the Moto E gets an upper hand design wise and the software front. Going by the reputation, Motorola provides android updates more often while the updates from Intex is not trustworthy. So if you’re looking for a budget device with latest features, go for Moto E. Moreover Intex Aqua I5 Mini terribly fails in providing good battery backup and a Quad core processor will surely drain the battery with in no time, so we opt for Moto E as it provides a good design, better display, latest updates and decent performance which is all backed by good battery power.

Overall Winner: Moto E

You're reading Moto E Vs Intex Aqua I5 Mini [In

Ducky One 2 Mini Vs. Razer Huntsman Mini: Which Is Better?

The Ducky One 2 mini and the Razer Huntsman mini are popular 60% mechanical gaming keyboards.

If you’re a mid-range to a pro gamer, you know that your keyboard can significantly affect your gaming action’s consistency, speed, and response. This means that having the right keyboard can be the game-changer you’ve been looking for.

While a gaming keyboard’s design is also critical, it’s less important than features like response, speed, ergonomics, and actuation. A keyboard that ranks well in response and actuation but falls below standards in design will still be a much better gaming keyboard than the one whose design is superior but whose features are subpar.

If you’re in the market for a Tenkeyless (TKL) gaming keyboard, you’ve likely come across recommendations of either the Ducky One 2 mini or the Huntsman mini. This is because they are some of the best mechanical gaming keyboards.

Ducky One 2 Mini


Rating: 4.5 out of 5.

Razer Huntsman Mini


Before diving into the particulars of both keyboards, it’s essential to understand what some terms used in the article mean. Here are a few examples of terms you will encounter in the article:

If you’re hearing key travel distance for the first time, it refers to the distance the keyboard switch requires to send a command after pressing. When defining key travel distance, we circle two terms: low travel keyboard and full travel keyboard. Outside of gaming, optimal key travel distance is a matter of preference. But, where distance can impact the outcome, like in gaming, it becomes an essential distinction.

Low-travel keyboards have a total key distance of 1.0mm to 2.5mm. You require minimal pressure to press the key and give a command. Full-travel keyboards have key travel distances of 3.0mm to 4.0mm. Typically, most mechanical gaming keyboards have full travel distance as they have fewer accidental strokes and are durable.

Actuation distance relates closely to key travel distance but has different meanings. Actuation distance is the distance the key travels to make a signal. This distance isn’t necessarily the entire length of the keystroke which would refer to the key travel distance.

Typically, actuation distance determines the responsiveness of a keyboard. The keyboard’s actuation distance may be insignificant if you’re a casual gamer. But pro gamers know that saving milliseconds in a competitive game is critical to the outcome.

Like any other product, durability is important when considering high-quality keyboards. Keyboards are rated by the number of keystrokes they can accept. Mid-range mechanical keyboards have a lifespan of 20-50 million keystrokes, while high-quality keyboards have a 50-100 million keystrokes lifespan.

Actuation force is the pressure you have to apply for the keys to respond to a command. Keys can have minimal, mid-range, or high actuation force. Keyboards with high actuation force require more pressure to actuate keys than minimal ones.

Now that we have reviewed the basic terms used in this article let’s delve into the actual review of these two keyboards.

Ducky One 2 Mini Keyboard


Rating: 4.5 out of 5.

See Price

Ducky One 2 Mini is one of the most popular mechanical gaming keyboards, and with good reason. It has several useful features, is durable, and has sleek packaging. It is also considered a premium keyboard, meaning you’ll have to dig deeper into your pockets to enjoy this high-quality keyboard.

As stated in the introduction, Ducky One 2 mini is a 60% gaming keyboard. The size is ideal for people with a clean, minimalist look or those with tight desk space. As for the design, the One 2 Mini has a clean, sophisticated look with dual-color backing. The keyboard’s top is black, and the back is black. The backplate is made of high-quality reinforced plastic, so you don’t have to worry about durability.

The keys are low-profile with a floating design. Their design and the dual-color combination complement the RGB backlighting. The entire design and color make the Ducky One 2 Mini one of the most appealing gaming keyboards available today.

Moving on to the connection type, this keyboard uses USB type B and C connections. The USB-A port is at the top-left edge of the keyboard. It also comes with a case to keep the cables clean and to help with packaging when traveling. For ergonomics, the One 2 Mini has two-level adjustable levers with rubber tips. The rubber tips are an excellent addition to ensuring the keyboard remains steady during game time.

One of the features that help any gaming keyboard stand out is the versatility of optical switches. The One 2 Mini does well on this front. It offers several Cherry MX Switch options like Brown, Blue, Speed, and others. All the Cherry MX switch options listed above will work well with this keyboard, but your preference depends on the extent of tactility and feel. This keyboard’s switches are smooth and stable, with no wobble or muffling. The response and feel might make typing with this keyboard your best typing experience yet. For gamers looking for the tactile bump, the Cherry MX Browns, Silent Reds, or the Speeds are ideal.

Away from the switches, the One 2 Mini also outperforms the keycaps front. The keycaps are made of durable PBT plastic that is highly resistant to shine. They also have a laser engraved label on the side and are thicker than other keycaps in the market. The packaging includes special keycaps and a keycap puller. Because the Ducky One 2 Mini is a standard 60% keyboard, it’s relatively easy to find compatible keycaps.

One of the downsides of this keyboard is that it doesn’t have dedicated software. But this shouldn’t be a big challenge because the manual has all the information on key combinations needed to customize the keyboard’s program. The One 2 Mini supports 6 profiles, each with 3-level macros. The manual also details the shortcuts and key combinations to customizing these profiles and macros.

For the RGB backlighting, the One 2 mini has various modes and colors you can utilize. You can assign specific or different colors depending on your preference. It also features playful modes like Gambling and Minesweeper, which you can utilize using the assigned shortcuts.

Overall, the Ducky One 2 Mini’s features, quality, and one-year warranty make it one of the best mechanical gaming keyboards on the market.

Texture high-quality PBT keycaps

Full per-key RGB backlighting

No board flex

Customizable macro support

Mechanical switches

No arrow keys

No dedicated software

Razer Huntsman Mini


Rating: 4.5 out of 5.

See Price

The Razer Huntsman Mini is an ambitious keyboard as it seeks to offer gamers everything they need in a compact keyboard. For its price, users can expect nothing less. From its design and features, the Huntsman mini gets close to being the ultimate gaming keyboard. It has an aluminum top plate and a sturdy plastic base. From the touch, everything feels strong and durable.

As you can tell from the name, it’s a 60% keyboard that works well for minimalist setups and small desk spaces. 60% keyboards are also ideal for travel. It comes in two colors: black and white. Overall the Huntsman Mini has a laid back but sophisticated design.

For connectivity, the Huntsman mini has a detachable type –C cable. It has a cable latch that ensures your cable is secured during gaming. The cable is long enough to ensure comfortable movement and distance during game time. In addition to the detachable cable, the Huntsman Mini ensures maximum comfort by having two-level adjustable feet inclined to 6 or 9 degrees.

For users who prioritize keyboards with dedicated software, the possibilities are endless with the Huntsman Mini’s Synapse software. You can reconfigure the RGB backlighting, remap the keys and save software configuration profiles. This keyboard supports up to 5 individual profiles.

Unfortunately, you can’t remap the 60% specific shortcut because of the secondary input limit.

One of the notable user-friendly features this keyboard has is the printed functions that help you perform basic customizations without downloading the software. These printed functions include the pre=set RGB effects, game mode activation, how to set your PC to sleep, and others.

Overall, the Huntsman Mini comes close to becoming the perfect gaming mechanical keyboard. Everything from the design, optical switches, PBT caps, and all other features is meant to deliver the ultimate gaming experience.

It has light optical switches that are responsive

Shine-free, durable PBT keycaps

Detachable cable

5 onboard memory profiles

Dedicated software

No dedicated arrow keys

Now that you understand the features, capabilities, pros, and cons of the One 2 Mini and Huntsman Mini, we’ll delve into a side-by-side comparison. Because both are top-rated gaming keyboards, it helps to have an in-depth comparison, especially if you’re looking to settle on either.

The design doesn’t significantly affect a keyboard’s capability, but it doesn’t have to have an appealing keyboard with even better features. The Ducky One 2 mini and the Huntsman Mini are 60% keyboards. The former has a dual-color scheme with white at the top and a black backplate. The Huntsman mini has an aluminum top plate and plastic backplate. While both are clean and stylish, the dual-color combination and the RGB backlighting effects have a more appealing look. If design matters to you, the Ducky One 2 mini is the one to go for.

There’s not much difference in the materials used in making both keyboards in terms of quality. The aluminum top plate and the plastic backplate on the Huntsman mini are sturdy and durable. So is the reinforced plastic on the Ducky One 2 Mini.

Both keycaps are made of PBT plastic which is high-quality and resistant to shine. The One 2 Mini’s keycaps are slightly thicker. But this doesn’t speak to the overall quality of the keyboard. None stands out, so it’s a tie on durability.

Both keyboards have high-quality PBT keycaps, but the One 2 Mini stands out with its customization. The One 2 Mini gives you extra keycaps that you can interchange with the ones on the keyboard to get a different color combination. You don’t get extras with the Huntsman Mini. Instead, Razer offers linear replacements purchased separately.

The Huntsman mini has Razer optical switches, while the One 2 Mini comes with Cherry MX Switches. The Cherry MX Switches have a smooth tactile bump. They have a total key travel distance of 4.00mm and a 45g actuation force. These switches score high in sound and weighting, especially for users who like light tactile switches.

Even though the Cherry MX Switches are excellent, they are still not a match for the Huntsman Mini’s optical switches. The optical switches have a 3.5mm total key travel and a 1.5 actuation point. The actuation force is 45g. The specifics of the optical switches mean the Huntsman Mini’s response is faster than the Cherry MX’s.

The difference in response is especially notable in competitive gaming, where seconds can significantly differ. The Cherry MXs feel better in smoothness and stability, but the optical switches respond better.

The ultimate choice depends on your priority, but if you’re willing to compromise on the response, the Ducky One 2 Mini is still a solid choice.

Both keyboards are 60% and similar in height, but the Ducky One is shorter with a slight angle. The One 2 Mini’s angle and height put less strain on the wrist. You don’t have to raise your arm slightly to type like you would with the Huntsman Mini. Both have two-level adjustable kickstands, so they tie on this part.

Both keyboards are standard 60% size with detachable USB-C cables. This makes both easy to pack for travel. The One 2 Mini has a cable storage case which is a plus, while the Huntsman Mini doesn’t. The case, however, doesn’t make a strong case for the One 2 Mini, as portability is the same.

You could argue that One 2 Mini is wider and taller, but the Huntsman Mini is wider, so they are even. The difference comes in at the slight weight difference. The One 2 Mini is slightly heavier than the Huntsman Mini, so if we consider all factors, the Huntsman wins.

On the surface, it can feel like both keyboards have similar RGB backlighting, but there are significant differences when you dig deeper. The main difference is in the customization. The One 2 Mini doesn’t require software for backlighting customization, while the Huntsman mini relies on the software. Comparing both processes, the Huntsman Mini customization process requires an extra step that the One 2 Mini doesn’t.

Additionally, the One 2 Mini’s dual-color concept compliments its RGB backlighting creating a more intense reflection and overall better appeal.

The Huntsman Mini has shorter key travel and actuation point, but the variety of switches the Ducky One 2 Mini offers means that you can find switches that match the Huntsman experience. This factor alone gives the One 2 Mini an edge over the other.

The One 2 Mini also has stabilizers, and the tactile bump and feedback of the switches make typing a breeze. Generally, tactile switches are best for typing because the feedback means better speed and accuracy. The angled floating key design on the One 2 Mini also means better wrist positioning and, consequently, better typing.

While the optical switches have shorter actuation distance, the Cherry MX switches have better tactile feedback and better typing pace features.

Even though the Cherry MX switches are equally good for gaming, the actuation point and the key travel distance on the Huntsman Mini’s optical switches save you seconds of reaction time in gaming. This puts the Huntsman Mini ahead of the One 2 mini in gaming. For users looking for an exclusive gaming keyboard without considering the differences in design and backlighting, the Huntsman Mini is an excellent choice.

While this article is focused on the Ducky One 2 Mini and the Razer Huntsman Mini, there are other things to consider when looking for a gaming keyboard. These include:

There’s no one-size-fits-all keyboard in gaming; some prefer the 60% keyboard, while others prefer the 75% or full-size keyboards. Tenkeyless and 605 keyboards are ideal for gamers with minimal working space or a minimalist and clean gaming setup. The full-size and 75% keyboards work for those with more space.

Like all other devices, quality is critical when buying a mechanical gaming keyboard. First, good quality guarantees longevity. If you’re looking to spend a significant amount on the purchase, you’ll need to feel like you’re getting value for money. Finally, high quality assures you that the keyboard won’t break down after a few months of use and can withstand intense gaming.

High-quality keyboards also offer replacement parts to replace the broken features instead of replacing the complete keyboard.

On the other hand, Membrane keys are popular with heavy-handed users who like to press firmly on the keyboard. They are also low-profile and typically affordable.

While features like key technology, connectivity, and quality are critical considerations, your budget ultimately dictates the gaming keyboard you purchase. Remember that price is not synonymous with quality. Several affordable gaming keyboard options are affordable and have excellent features.

The Ducky One 2 Mini and Razer Huntsman Mini are supreme gaming keyboards. Both aim to offer gamers the ultimate experience with many features targeting user experience, comfort, durability, speed, and response. However, the One 2 Mini scores higher in the design, switch, and ergonomics sectors, while the Huntsman Mini ranks better at gaming and software.

Both are durable and portable as they are 60% with detachable cables. Even though this article reviews the keyboard’s features, it all comes down to preference. Remember to refer to your budget before settling on either.

Most aspects of gaming vary from person to person. Some gamers prefer tactile switches like the Cherry MX switches on the One 2 Mini, while others lean towards the optical switches on the Huntsman mini.

The keyboards’ main differences are switch types, ergonomics, software, and accessories. The One 2 Mini has Cherry MX switches, while the Huntsman Mini has optical switches. The former doesn’t have dedicated software and has an angled floating key design, while the latter has dedicated software and is relatively lower.

Moto X Vs Google Nexus 5 Comparison Overview

Moto X features a 4.7 inch AMOLED capacitive touchscreen display with a HD resolution of 1280 x 720 pixels and a pixel density of 312 pixels per inch and it is protected with Corning Gorilla Glass. In comparison, the LG made Nexus 5 boasts of a slightly larger 4.95 inch True HD IPS+ capacitive touchscreen display packed with FHD 1920 x 1080 pixel resolution resulting in 445 ppi pixel density. Further, the Nexus 5’s screen is topped with the Corning Gorilla Glass 3 protection.

Nexus 5 not only packs a FHD resolution screen for improved clarity, but also has IPS display that can offer good viewing angles, enhanced daylight visibility, better color reproduction and sharper images. But, on the other hand, the AMOLED display in the Moto X consumes less power and thereby saves the battery life to a great extent despite offering good clarity.

Camera and Memory

The Moto X has a 10 MP rear camera teamed with autofocus and LED flash while the Nexus 5 gets an 8 MP primary camera with improved features such as OIS, autofocus and LED flash. Obviously, Nexus 5 wins our hearts in this segment with OIS as it can capture images and videos with great stability. Also, in the front camera segment, the Nexus 5 comes with a 1.3 MP sensor while its counterpart has a 2 MP front-facer with support to FHD 1080p video recording.

On the memory part, both the Moto X and Nexus 5 are on par with each other as they come in two options: 16 GB and 32 GB and feature 2 GB of RAM. However, the memory capacity cannot be expanded externally as the phones do not possess a micro SD expansion slot. With 2 GB RAM, these phones will surely fare well as they can run multiple applications effortlessly.

Moto X includes a 2,200 mAh battery rated to provide 13 hours of talk time and 576 hours of standby time, whereas Nexus 5 is fueled by a 2,300 mAh battery delivering 17 hours of talk time and 300 hours of standby time. But, we think the battery in Nexus 5 is small to power the device considering its FHD display and quad-core processor.

Moto X runs on Android 4.2.2 Jelly Bean with a promised upgrade to Android 4.4 KitKat while on the other hand, the Nexus 5 is the first device to be announced with the Android 4.4 KitKat and it runs on the version 4.4.2 with increased chances for further upgrades, which the Moto X might miss.

Key Specs

Model Moto X Nexus 5

Display 4.7 inch HD 4.95 inch FHD

Processor 1.7 GHz Dual-Core 2.3 GHz Quad-Core


Internal Storage 16 GB/32 GBNon-Expandable 16 GB/32 GBNon-Expandable

OS Android 4.2.2 Android 4.4.2

Camera 10 MP/2 MP 8 MP/ 1.3 MP

Battery 2200 mAh 2300 mAh

Price Rs 23,999 Rs 28,999


Both the Nexus 5 and Moto X are capable smartphones with mid-range pricing, but the Nexus 5 is somewhat better than the Motorola offering as it comes with top-tier aspects making its slightly higher pricing acceptable. According to me, the Google Nexus 5 is the best one if you do not mind shedding extra bucks.

Tesco Hudl 2 Vs Ipad Mini 4 Comparison

So buying the still excellent Hudl 2, which may have less impressive features but will be ideal for browsing the web, playing causal games, watching movies, using social media, replying to emails and more, and you’ll have £300 left over to spend on something else. So if you’ve read this entire comparison and are still considering the Hudl 2 then that should be all you need to know!

Apple has just unveiled its new iPad mini 4, which unlike its predecessor has some pretty significant spec bumps to make it thinner, lighter and speedier. Last year, we compared the iPad mini 3 with the Tesco Hudl 2 and decided that the iPad mini 3 wasn’t worth the £190 extra, but is the iPad mini 4 worth the extra money? We investigate in our Tesco Hudl 2 vs iPad mini 4 comparison.

Hudl 2 vs iPad mini 4 comparison: UK price and availability

The Tesco Hudl 2 is one of the best budget tablets you can buy, currently available for a brilliant £99. That’s compared with the iPad mini 4’s £319 price tag, so you’re looking at an additional £220 if you opt for Apple’s tablet. You could buy three Tesco Hudl 2’s for the price of one iPad mini 4. See also: Best tablets of 2024

And we’re only talking about the starting price for the iPad mini, too. If you want the 64GB or 128GB you’re looking at £399 or £479 respectively, and add £100 to each price tag if you want to throw in 4G connectivity.

The Tesco Hudl 2 is only available in one model with 16GB of storage, and it’s WiFi only. It does offer a microSD card slot to allow you to add up to 32GB more space, though.

Both tablets are available to buy now, but which you choose is ultimately going to come down to budget. However, even if you’ve got the funds for the £319 iPad mini 4, it’s well worth considering whether you really need to spend it or whether the £99 Tesco Hudl 2 can in fact do everything you’re looking for in a tablet.

Hudl 2 vs iPad mini 4 comparison: Design and build

It’s pretty clear which of these tablets is the cheaper of the two just by looking at them, purely because the iPad mini 4 is made with sleek, stylish aluminium while the Hudl 2 is made with matt plastic. Both look great, but it’s obvious which is designed to look more premium. Plus, the Hudl 2 has thicker bezels around the display than the iPad mini 4.

We found the Hudl 2 to be easy to grip and comfortable to hold, though, and it comes in a wide variety of fun colours. The iPad mini 4’s colour options are Silver, Gold and Slate Grey.

Getting down to numbers now, you’ll find that the Hudl 2 is bigger overall (not least because it has an 8.3in display while the iPad mini 4’s display is 7.9in), and is thicker at 9mm and heavier at 410g.

The iPad mini 4 is an amazing 6.1mm thick and 299g, so is certainly more portable and you’ll hardly notice that it’s in your handbag or even your suit pocket, while the Hudl 2 might not quite fit in a handbag and you’re much more likely to be aware of its weight.

Here, we’d say choose the iPad mini 4 if looks are super-important to you and you plan on taking it out and about regularly. Otherwise, you could opt for the still lovely-looking Hudl 2 and save yourself £220…

Hudl 3 vs iPad mini 4 comparison: Display

As mentioned, the iPad mini 4’s display is smaller than the Hudl 2’s, at 7.9in diagonally compared with 8.3in.

That 7.9in display boasts a pixel density of 326ppi thanks to a resolution of 2048 x 1536, which is brilliant for watching movies and playing games. The Hudl 2 has a full HD display (1920 x 1200 pixels) amounting to 272ppi. It’s still a great screen though, so you’ll still find that it offers bright, crisp and colourful images, and that bigger display means a bit more screen estate for watching videos.

Hudl 3 vs iPad mini 4 comparison: Specs, hardware and performance

Inside the Hudl 2, you’ll find an Intel Atom quad-core processor clocked at 1.83GHz paired with 2GB RAM. It’s smooth enough to cope with web browsing, responding to emails and running casual games and apps, so if that’s what you’re intending to use your tablet for most then it’s going to be plenty fast enough for you.

The iPad mini 4, on the other hand, is equipped with a super-speedy, 64-bit A8 processor that’ll power even graphics-heavy games and hungry apps.

We’ve get to run benchmark tests on the new iPad mini 4 but when we do, we’ll update this article with the results to find out how they compare with the Hudl 2. However, we’re expecting the iPad mini 4 to blow the Hudl 2 out of the water when it comes to all three of our tests for processor speed, graphics performance and javascript.

However, that can be expected from a device that costs £220 more, and as we’ve mentioned, the Hudl 2 is by no means sluggish.

You’ll find that the Tesco Hudl 2 is only available with 16GB of built-in storage, but it offers a microSD card slot for the ability to add 32GB more for a total of 48GB.

The iPad mini 4 is available with 16GB, 64GB or 128GB, but none of those options offer a microSD card slot so we’d strongly recommend opting for the 64GB model over the 16GB model, as you’ll soon use that space up if you plan on downloading apps or storing movies on there.

When it comes to connectivity, the Hudl 2 has a miniHDMI port for connecting to your TV, Bluetooth 4.0, 802.11 WiFi and GPS.

The iPad mini 4 doesn’t have a miniHDMI, but it does offer faster Bluetooth and WiFi, at Bluetooth 4.2 and 802.11ac respectively. It also has 3G/4G connectivity (although that comes at a cost as demonstrated in the price section of this comparison), which isn’t an option with the Hudl 2 so you’ll only be able to access the internet when WiFi is available.

The iPad mini 4 also has the additional Touch ID fingerprint sensor beneath the home button for extra security. It can be used to unlock the iPad itself, or as an alternative to passwords for some apps.

You’re looking at a longer battery life with the iPad mini 4 too, at up to 10 hours (possibly more with the introduction of the more efficient and battery friendly iOS 9) compared with 8 hours for the Hudl 2.

Onto cameras now, of which both tablets offer two, one on the front and one on the back. The Hudl 2’s cameras are actually pretty great for the price tag. On the back is a 5Mp snapper and the front-facing camera is 1.2Mp.

The iPad mini 4 also has a 1.2Mp camera on the front, but the rear-facing camera is 8Mp.

Hudl 2 vs iPad mini 4 comparison: Software

The Hudl 2 is an Android tablet that runs Android 4.4 KitKat, which is a bit of a shame because that’s since been replaced by 5.0 Lollipop and now 6.0 Marshmallow. However, we do like that Tesco hasn’t messed about with the user interface too much, keeping it reasonably vanilla.

The iPad mini 4 runs the brand new iOS 9, which you can find out more about by following the links below.

How to downgrade from iOS 9 to iOS 8

How to get iOS 9 on your iPhone, iPad and iPod touch

We still think that software unlimitedly comes down to personal preference. You’ll probably already know whether you prefer Android or iOS, but the iPad mini 4 does get you the most up to date software available while the Hudl 2’s is quite old.

Specs Tesco Hudl 2: Specs

Android 4.4 KitKat

8.3in Full HD (1920×1200)

Intel Atom quad-core processor

16GB storage

microSD (up to 32GB)

5Mp rear camera

1.2Mp front camera

Dual-band Wi-Fi

Stereo speakers

8 hour battery life



Best Ipad Mini 5 Cases In 2023

1. Ztotop

Ztotop has come up with a classy folio case for iPad mini 5. The case flaunts smooth synthetic leather exterior with neat craftsmanship.

And with the anti-slip interior lining, it enables the tablet to fight out regular bumps and scratches effortlessly. There are multiple grooves so that you can position your iPad in the desired angle.

It also has a built-in organizer pocket wherein your cards and documents can rest securely. Besides, you can use the elastic strap to hold your device comfortably.

2. Apple Smart Cover

At $39, Apple’s “Smart Cover” is probably the most expensive sleek case for iPad mini 5. However, looking at the elegant profile, it does appear to be a fine prospect for your ultra-portable tablet.

Made from the single piece of polyurethane, the cover can provide the basic safeguard to your device. Courtesy the multiple viewing angles, Smart Cover ensures you have much-improved typing and hands-free media watching experience.

Plus, this slim cover also works reliably with auto sleep/wake functionality, making sure there is no unnecessary power consumption. On top of all, Apple offers this case in multiple color options including papaya, charcoal gray, white and pink sand.

3. ESR Urban Premium

Give your iPad a classy profile to look authoritative. ESR Urban Premium is the sort of case which gives a vintage appearance to your iPad.

What makes it an adorable pick is the Oxford material with the knitted textile weave. Plus, it also has a solid PC casing to endure bumps.

There are a couple of anti-slip grooves to boost your viewing experience. And thanks to the strong magnets, Urban Premium works consistently with the auto sleep/wake function.

4. ESR Yippee

Do you prefer a minimalist profile? If yes, ESR Yippee could be a good option for your ultra-portable tablet.

The case features clear design and comes with a durable polyurethane exterior. With the inclusion of a soft microfiber inner shell, you can expect this sleek cover to resist scuffs.

Thanks to the frosted finish and grippy design, your hand will feel more comfortable to hold the Mini. Lastly, the cutouts and the buttons all seem to be on point to let you control your device without any hassle.

5. Snugg

Should you want to go for a top-notch keyboard case for your 2023 iPad mini, you should keep in mind this offering from Snugg. It has a very sturdy construction and comes with a 360° rotatable design.

Thanks to the multi-angle adjustments, you get more comfortable media watching and typing experience. The keys are responsive and provide the needed tactile feedback to speed up typing.

Lastly, Snugg claims that the case keyboard case delivers long battery life. So, you won’t have to power it up too frequently.


Yet another clear case for iPad mini 5. Due mainly to the pretty soft material, this cover provides a much better grip. And with the form-fitting construction, it wraps around the tablet perfectly.

Though it’s incredibly sleek, the cover should be able to keep your device protected from scratches. Lastly, the cutouts are made to be precise so that you will be able to access the Lightning port and speakers easily.

7. Veco

Imitation denim design creates a strong impression for Veco’s iPad mini case. A combination of elegance and fashion imparts a stylish look; almost a book-style appearance. Veco has created a scratch-resistant, anti-slip, anti-crease, and sweatproof case for your mini tablet.

PU leather exterior prevents scratches from damaging your iPad. For protection against shocks, drops, and impacts, Veco has used soft TPU back cover and microfiber interior.


DTTO offers a premium leather case with Apple Pencil holder for your mini iPad 2023. The multi-functional design of this case boasts built-in leather hand strap, pencil holder and organizer pocket. The hand strap allows you to hold your iPad in the most comfortable position while you are using your tablet. The organizer pocket stores some essential stuff like your business cards, currency notes, etc.

DTTO has made this case from the durable, premium synthetic leather exterior and inner soft TPU. There are some inner multiple slots to set up horizontal stand angles for FaceTime calls, watching movies, and typing long text messages.

9. Hocase

Hocase brings floral design on a PU leather to create a smart case for your iPad mini 5th generation. This microfiber lining hardback cover flaunts unique mandala flower pattern, which adds feminine charm to the case.

In a day, you meet a lot of challenges; your iPad should be prepared to face all the action. Durable polyurethane leather and microfiber lining protect your iPad mini from many perils.


During your hectic schedule, you may forget to carry your Apple Pencil; for this reason, JUQITECH gives a dedicated slot to insert your stylus. Thus, you can use your Apple Pencil whenever you wish and your premium pencil never gets lost.

11. TiMOVO

The translucent frosted back protector guards your device against scratches. This slim and lightweight case doesn’t add any bulk to your iPad, and therefore, you can easily carry your tablet anywhere.

There you go! I guess your iPad has finally got a deserving cover. Would you mind sharing a few tidbits about it?

Stay Tuned In For More…

As we are going to review a ton of accessories for iPad Mini, so stay tuned in with us so that you don’t miss out on them. Rest assured, we will also add more worthy covers in this lineup as and when they are available.

You may also like to catch up with these posts:

Author Profile


The founder of iGeeksBlog, Dhvanesh, is an Apple aficionado, who cannot stand even a slight innuendo about Apple products. He dons the cap of editor-in-chief to make sure that articles match the quality standard before they are published.

Motorola Moto G 2024 Review

Our Verdict

With various upgrades including a waterproof design, great cameras and stock Android, the new Moto G 2024 is a great affordable phone. The device is still a bit chunky and it’s a shame to see the stereo speakers gone. It’s worth opting for the model with 16GB of storage and 2GB of RAM. Now with a price cut to £149, the Moto G 3rd-gen is the best budget phone you can buy.

As expected, Motorola has announced a new version of the Moto G budget phone and we were at the London launch event to check it out. We grabbed a sample at the event so here’s our full and in-depth Motorola Moto G 2024 review. See: Best budget phones 2024.

You’ll also like: Moto G5 UK release date, price and specification rumours – when is the new Moto G 2023 coming out?

Update 18/05/16: Motorola yesterday unveiled the new Moto G and G Plus for 2024, and has therefore reduced the price of this older handset to £149. Read more about the brand-new Moto G in our Moto G4 review.

The Moto G series of phones from Motorola has got a little confusing with this being the third generation but there being four different versions previously. This is mostly because of Motorola adding and taking away 4G LTE support. This means the phone goes by various names such as Moto G 2024, Moto G3 and Moto G 3rd gen.

Nevertheless, this is the Moto G for 2024 and Motorola is under more pressure for the best budget phone with fresh competition from the likes of the  EE Harrier Mini and Vodafone Smart Ultra 6. Here are our first impressions of the new Moto G.

See also: Motorola Moto X Style review.

Moto G 2024 (3rd gen) review: Price

Update: The price has been dropped to £149 (on sale for £129 at the time of writing) on the Moto Maker meaning that it now fits within our best budget smartphone chart. Prices below were correct at initial launch.

Motorola has been king of budget phones for a long time and the Moto G has proven to be a difficult device to beat. The news of the third generation Moto G is exciting but the phone is now more expensive at £179 for the cheaper model and £209 for the higher capacity. 

See also: Moto G 2024 vs Moto G 2014 comparison review.

Our best budget phones group test has an upper limit of £150 so really the Moto G is no longer a cheap phone. That doesn’t mean it isn’t good value, though.

However, that price is if you use the Moto Maker (see below) but if you go to retailers like Amazon, Clove and Mobile Fun you’ll only need to pay £159 (or less) which is more like it but still not quite budget.

Moto G 2024 (3rd gen) review: Design and build

Once again, the Moto G looks pretty similar even to the original but understandably closer to the style of the 2014 model. It’s a good looking phone, especially for the budget end of the market. It is a little thicker and heavier, though, at 11.6mm and 157g.

Motorola has made the Moto G look more stylish with the metal strip which houses the rear camera and the iconic dimpled logo. The front slots are flush but unfortunately Motorola has removed the stereo speakers. The recessed slots also provide a place for dirt to collect.

There’s a new texture to the rear cover and the shape looks similar the Moto X but the Moto G is, of course, made of plastic. Motorola Shell colours include Black, Navy, Cabernet, Golden Yellow, Lime, Cherry, Blue, Turqouise, Raspberry and Chalk. There are also Flip Shells, too.

As you can see from the photos, our review sample is the black model with red accent colour and the Cabernet rear cover. The rear cover isn’t the most comfortable around with its diagonal ridges but the curved shape helps.

IPX7 waterproofing which was rumoured turned out to be spot on so you won’t have to worry if you knock over your drink or drop the Moto G down the toilet. The rating means the phone will survive being submerged in up to one meter of water for up to 30 minutes.It’s a feature you won’t find on other budget phones.

In our dunk test we did find water gets underneath the cover but the rubber seals stop water getting where it should be – we recommend removing the cover and drying everything if you do submerge the phone.

A major new feature in this area is that the Moto G 2024 is available to order via the Moto Maker meaning you can customise the phone with different front colours, rear covers, accent colours, engraving and storage capacities.

The new Moto G feels nice in the hand and gives the impression of being more premium than previous generations. It certainly feels like a mid-range device rather than budget.

Moto G 2024 (3rd gen) review: Hardware and specs

The screen of the Moto G remains at 5in and although we had our fingers crossed, the resolution hasn’t been bumped to Full HD (1080×1920). Instead it remains at 720p so the Vodafone Ultra 6 outclasses it here with Full HD at a lower price. Although the display is still 720p, it’s still good quality and it has good brightness and colour reproduction.

As you might expect, the processor has also been upgraded. This time there’s a Qualcomm Snapdragon 410 chip (1.4GHz quad-core) which is the same as found in the new Moto E 4G.

That’s a little disappointing on the face of it but performance is nice and smooth regardless of this and the benchmark results which don’t make for impressive reading on the whole. It beats the previous model but gets outdone by the cheaper Moto E in three tests – as does the £125 Vodafone Smart Ultra 6.

The amount of memory has been doubled to 2GB of RAM but you’ll only get that if you buy the 16GB model- the 8GB model has 1GB of RAM. There’s still a Micro-SD card slot and it can take cards up to 32GB in size.

Upgrades continue with a new 13Mp camera, up from 8Mp which is impressive for a budget smartphone. In fact, it’s the same camera from the Nexus 6 (which Motorola made) with improvements such as a new lens and an IR filter. There’s a dual-LED flash, too and video can be shot at up to 1080p or 720p for slow motion.

The front camera has also been increased in terms of resolution, from 2- to 5Mp with a wide angle lens making it able to offer much higher quality selfies.

As usual, the default for the main camera is 16:9 meaning you’ll get 9.7Mp so switching to 4:3 will make use of the full complement of pixels. Another default is no touch to focus which is a little annoying but you can switch it on even though it’s a little tricky to use. We found the camera snaps quickly and quality of still photos is generally excellent. Video is also good, helped by the OIS, but it nothing overly special. Check out our samples below.

Camera test with HDR on

Camera test macro

There are no major frills when it comes to connectivity – there’s still no NFC which is a shame but the Moto G 2024 does have that all-important 4G LTE support.

The battery comes in at 2470mAh but Motorola didn’t mention the TurboCharge feature found on the new Moto X which is supposedly even faster than the Galaxy S6. The firm claims 24 hours of mixed use from the Moto G.

Even without a large battery (which is non-removable despite the rear cover coming off), we found battery life to be excellent. In our benchmark test the Moto G managed six hours and 29 minutes with a score of 2596. That’s not far off the Galaxy S6 which lasted for six hours and 53 minutes.

Moto G 2024 (3rd gen) review: Software

There’s not a great deal to say about software as Motorola is sticking to offering a very stock Android and the Moto G comes pre-loaded with version 5.1.1 Lollipop.

We’re seeing more and more Android manufacturers going with a vanilla user experience and we like it. It’s not a completely Nexus-like software setup though as Motorola does add some of its own apps – that’s not a bad thing though.

The firm adds things like Moto Assist, Moto Display and Moto Actions which are now bundles into one app simple named Moto. You can easily make sure the phone stays quiet when you’re in bed or automatically change settings based on your location.

Actions mean you can ‘double karate chop’ to launch the torch and twist to launch the camera app. Display will show you notifications when the phone detects movement and you can select which apps are allowed and how much of the notification is shown.

Apart from Migrate which helps you move content from a previous phone, the Moto G is essentially stock Android meaning you have a nice blank canvas with which to customise.

Update the detailed information about Moto E Vs Intex Aqua I5 Mini [In on the website. We hope the article's content will meet your needs, and we will regularly update the information to provide you with the fastest and most accurate information. Have a great day!