Trending December 2023 # Part 5) Two Heads In Place Of One # Suggested January 2024 # Top 20 Popular

You are reading the article Part 5) Two Heads In Place Of One updated in December 2023 on the website We hope that the information we have shared is helpful to you. If you find the content interesting and meaningful, please share it with your friends and continue to follow and support us for the latest updates. Suggested January 2024 Part 5) Two Heads In Place Of One

From Seeing Through the Illusion: Understanding Apple’s Mastery of the Media, a profile examining Apple’s PR strategy:

Months after announcing her departure, Katie Cotton has moved on from Apple, according to a person close to the former executive. She is no longer involved in the media strategy that she led for 18 years, and is not participating in recruiting a replacement. A source told us that “Cotton does not believe in searching for her own successor.” While Tim Cook is pondering the future of the department, Cotton left Apple PR in the hands of two longtime deputies: Steve Dowling and Natalie Kerris. The interim leaders (pictured left and top right, respectively) took over in May, and now both report directly to Cook.

Even without Cotton at the helm, Apple’s PR department continues to move forward. As an Apple employee said, “the team is still rolling and cranking; there’s still an overall strategy.” But the team is being steered by two executives with different expertise and approaches. Dowling ran the Corporate Communications team for the last decade. He joined Apple’s PR team in 2003 after serving as CNBC’s Silicon Valley Bureau Chief since 2000, and Washington Bureau Chief from 1995 to 2000.

This extends to his work within Apple’s doors. Dowling holds a weekly meeting to discuss relevant topics with the top PR members, rotating between Tuesdays and Thursdays. Apple PR employees say that they learn enough from the meetings to actually take notes. He additionally takes time to receive feedback on his reports and discuss how Apple PR could improve. People close to Dowling also say that the executive doesn’t play Cotton-like power games, but note that “he could improve his mentoring and leadership skills versus mostly focusing on just getting the work done himself.”

Some sources opined that Dowling is “smarter than Katie,” and suggested that he would be a good fit to replace her. Dowling is said to be “close” friends with Tim Cook, and Cook is said to have referred to Dowling as such during internal meetings. Cook and Dowling are often seen together, in part because of Apple’s policy of using PR staff to guard key executives. Dowling’s high place in Apple’s hierarchy has been demonstrated by his name often appearing alongside Katie Cotton’s on critical announcements such as Steve Jobs’s resignation and the firing of Scott Forstall.

Cotton’s other replacement, Natalie Kerris, has mostly led PR and Communications for flagship Apple products such as the iPhone since joining Apple in 2001. Although our sources opined that Dowling could serve as more of an actual successor to Cotton, current and former Apple journalists praised Kerris for her blunt approach; one reporter said that Kerris will skip formalities and PR jargon and formalities to cut to the chase. We were told that while Kerris is “very smart,” there is “sort of a drama element to her” that makes her like “Cotton Jr.” One source said that “it would likely be more of the same [as during Katie’s era] if Nat completely took over.” If Cook is truly seeking a refreshed approach to PR at Apple, Kerris would be less likely to get the top job.

Both Kerris and Dowling are said to be individually lobbying to take Cotton’s place, which makes recent reports about Apple’s consideration of former White House Press Secretary Jay Carney for the job all the more interesting. After the consistently-reliable Re/code first reported that Carney was “bandied” about in connection to the open Apple position, The Loop‘s Jim Dalrymple claimed that this was not true. Sources say that it was Kerris who told Dalrymple and other reporters that the claims of Carney’s consideration were false. Since Carney was exiting the world’s most important and high-profile PR job and in talks with multiple technology companies, Apple would be irresponsible to have not considered Carney in some capacity, so it’s unclear why anyone at the company would actively deny the report.

— See Part 6) Controversies: From Maps to Beats to Haunted Empires

FTC: We use income earning auto affiliate links. More.

You're reading Part 5) Two Heads In Place Of One

Pillars Of Eternity: The White March Part Two Review: An Incredible, Apocalyptic Finish

NOTE: Expect SPOILERS throughout this article for both Pillars of Eternity and the first half of the White March expansion. I recommend skipping to the end if you just want to know whether to buy the expansion as a whole.

How naive. We probably should’ve guessed that the power of Durgan’s Battery would draw more than laborers to Stalwart. Eyes have turned towards the village. Hundreds of eyes. The eyes of an army set to sweep through the entire world, leaving nothing but ruin in its wake.

And you’re the only one who knows.

The big finale

After playing through the first half of The White March last August, I said “What we have in The White March Part One is a low-stakes, low-reward dungeon crawl padded with some filler quests.” And I stand by that, because Part One was tedious.

Part Two makes up for it. Apocalyptic—that’s the best way to describe The White March Pt. 2, which once again brings you to the snowy mountains surrounding Stalwart and Durgan’s Battery. If you’ve already finished the expansion’s first half, you’ll need to rest once in Dyrwood to trigger the second section.

Do so and you’ll have a dream. An omen. You see hundreds of eyes, staring through you. You see the aforementioned army sweeping down from the mountains, eventually crushing your fortress of Caead Nua into dust and reducing the world to embers. And you think to yourself, “This seems bad.”

So it’s off to the White March region again. Regardless of how long ago you were actually there, the game acts like it’s been a few months. Returning to Stalwart, you’re hailed as a hero. Seemingly everyone recognizes you—“The hero who re-lit the fires of Durgan’s Battery!” People are a lot friendlier. The town is bustling. The mines are open again. But…well, there’s an army encamped near Durgan’s Battery, called The Iron Flail. Maybe that’s who you seek?


And the issue is…Part One still exists. In order to get to The White March Part Two you’ll need to plod through ten or so hours of first-act fluff. Is it worth it? I think so. But you may value your time in an RPG differently.

Regardless, Obsidian should be commended for minimizing re-traversal in The White March. I half-expected to spend Part Two double-speeding through the same areas as last time, fighting new enemies on the same ol’ maps. A few pull double-duty—namely Stalwart and parts of Durgan’s Battery—but in general you’re exploring untouched areas of the White March region, from long-forgotten abbeys to military forts.

As far as raw numbers, I count five or six major new areas and one new companion (Maneha, a barbarian). There are also the usual handful of unique weapons, smaller tasks, et cetera, though nothing quite as big as the raft of new features in Part One. Perhaps the biggest change from a mechanical standpoint is (once again) to spellcasting—wizards/druids/priests/et cetera now “Master” certain spells, meaning they can be cast once per encounter without taking up a slot in your grimoire. The tradeoff is that lower-level spell tiers don’t just recharge uses out of combat anymore, as far as I can tell.

But these are small tweaks, and they rightfully play backup to the story this time around—a story that builds to a climax that’s honestly as good as anything in the main Pillars of Eternity storyline. Perhaps better, given The White March’s shorter overall length. I clocked the second half at ten hours, bringing the expansion to twenty hours total. Not too shabby.

Bottom line

For those of you who skipped the spoilers: I (with some caveats) like it. The White March has its issues—pacing problems in the first half, an over-reliance on huge groups of enemies in the second, and three companions who aren’t given enough time to breathe before their quests are over—but it’s a solid expansion with some incredible moments sprinkled throughout. I still think it’s a better piece of content if you encounter it organically during your first Pillars of Eternity run, but both halves combined are a pretty good argument for end-gamers to dive back in. For a short while, at least.

How To Merge Two Macos Accounts Into One

If you have two user accounts on macOS and want to merge them into one, a simple solution would be to first back up the data of one account, then delete it. macOS doesn’t offer any simpler way to merge two accounts. This tutorial shows how to back up and archive the data of one account, move it over to the other account, and lastly, merge the two macOS accounts together.

Export Your Data

The method we are using to merge both accounts relies on merging the local files present on the system. All the local files present in a user’s Home folder are saved in a disk image, which can be accessed on the new account. Since the local files do not include any app backups, you’ll need to export this data separately.

If you don’t use iCloud Sync, you can create an Apple ID and sync all data with it. If you do this, log in to the iCloud account on your other account, which will allow you to access your data.

You can also choose to export the data from the specific apps:

Merging Two Accounts Into One

This method will merge the data of both accounts into one by deleting the old account and saving its data in a disk image. Hence, it is recommended to make another backup of the data, either on Time Machine or on a local drive before proceeding. This is to ensure that you don’t lose any data unintentionally.

In the newer account (the one you want to keep), open System Preferences on your Mac. Later versions of macOS label the System Preferences app as “System Settings.”

Image source: Apple

If you’re using a newer version of macOS, select the red “Delete Account …” button.

macOS will ask how to proceed. Select “Save the home folder in a disk image.” Make sure you choose the disk image option to give you access to the files in it.

Locate a Deleted User’s Data Frequently Asked Questions Can I mount a disk image using Windows 11 to transfer my macOS data to a PC?

Yes. However, you will need a third-party app like DMG Extractor to extract the user data from the disk image file. Disk image file extensions are native to macOS. If you are making the switch to PC, be sure to discover our tips for macOS users switching to Windows.

When combining data between two users on the Mac, how can I locate specific files?

Oftentimes you may only want to combine a portion of the user data from one Home folder before you migrate it to another user’s Home folder. If you know the name of the file you are looking for within a user’s Home folder, you can launch Terminal in the current folder to pinpoint specific data.

How do I reveal hidden files in a user’s Home folder before combining the user data into one account?

If you’re having trouble locating some of the files from the deleted user account, you can access the Home folder using the Terminal app to manage the visibility attributes of files and even add/remove hidden file flags. Read on to learn how to unhide files inside a user’s Home folder.

Image credit: Kaitlyn Baker via Unsplash All screenshots taken by Brahm Shank

Brahm Shank

Self-proclaimed coffee connoisseur and tech enthusiast Brahm Shank is captivated by the impact of consumer tech: “It’s profoundly moving when people discover that the phone in their pocket or the tiny computer on their wrist has the power to enrich their lives in ways they never imagined.” Apple, Inc. and its unique position at the intersection of technology and the creative arts, resonates deeply with Brahm and his passion for helping people unleash their potential using technology. Over the years, Brahm has held various podcasts – including famed technologist David Pogue of The New York Times on topics such as Big Tech and digital wellness.

Subscribe to our newsletter!

Our latest tutorials delivered straight to your inbox

Sign up for all newsletters.

By signing up, you agree to our Privacy Policy and European users agree to the data transfer policy. We will not share your data and you can unsubscribe at any time.

Symantec Seizes Part Of Massive Peer

The cybercriminals behind ZeroAccess, one of the largest botnets in existence, have lost access to more than a quarter of the infected machines they controlled because of an operation executed by security researchers from Symantec.

ZeroAccess has a peer-to-peer architecture where every infected computer can relay files, instructions and information to other computers—peers—in the botnet. This mechanism is used by its operators for command and control (C&C), making ZeroAccess more resilient to takedown attempts than botnets that depend on dedicated C&C servers.

Bot hijack

Earlier this year, security researchers from Symantec found a practical way to liberate ZeroAccess bots from the botmasters by leveraging a known design weakness in the peer-to-peer mechanism.

However, in June the botnet’s creators started distributing a new version of the malware containing modifications to address the known flaw. This led to Symantec’s decision to launch a sinkholing operation in mid-July—an operation that involves hijacking the bots in a way that would prevent attackers from regaining control of them.

“This operation quickly resulted in the detachment of over half a million bots and made a serious dent to the number of bots controlled by the botmaster,” the Symantec researchers said Monday in a blog post.

The sinkholed bots hadn’t been updated and still have the weakness, but they were isolated to the point where they now only communicate with servers run by Symantec, said Vikram Thakur, principal security response manager at Symantec. “We do not believe that there is any way for the botmasters to regain control of these bots.”

The sinkholing operation took only a few days, but Symantec has since worked to make sure that its sinkhole is stable and shared data with ISPs (Internet service providers) and computer emergency response teams (CERTs) so they can start the process of identifying and cleaning the infected computers.

“We wanted to make sure that the foundation for remediation was solid before we announced it to the public,” Thakur said.

ISPs have been provided with traffic signatures that will help identify ZeroAccess bots on their networks, so they can act to take measures even against the bots that haven’t been sinkholed, Thakur said.

The Symantec researchers performed tests in the lab in order to estimate the botnet’s energy costs to victims and how much money it generates for its owners.

Bitcoin mining

The company estimated that the Bitcoin mining activity, which uses computational power to generate Bitcoins, a type of virtual currency, would consume an additional 1.82 kWh per day for every infected computer, if that computer would be turned on all the time.

“But multiply this figure by 1.9 million for the whole botnet and we are now looking at energy usage of 3,458,000 KWh (3,458 MWh), enough to power over 111,000 homes each day,” the Symantec researchers said. “This amount of energy is considerably greater than the output of the largest power station in Moss Landing, California, which could produce 2,484 MW and would come with a corresponding electricity bill of [US]$560,887 a day.”

Assuming that all computers in the botnet would be like the ones used by Symantec for testing—which were not very powerful and had old-generation Pentium D CPUs—the botnet would generate around $2,165 worth of Bitcoins per day. That amount doesn’t justify the energy costs, but since it’s at someone else’s expense, it’s a highly attractive proposition for the botnet operators, the Symantec researchers said.

Python Program Addition Of Two Matrix

Given two user input matrix. Our task is to display the addition of two matrix. In these problem we use nested List comprehensive.

Algorithm Step1: input two matrix. Step 2: nested for loops only to iterate through each row and columns. Step 3: At each iterationshall add the corresponding elements from two matrices and shall store the result. Example code # Program to add two matrices using nested loop A=[] n=int(input("Enter N for N x N matrix : ")) #3 here #use list for storing 2D array #get the user input and store it in list (here IN : 1 to 9) for i in range(n): row=[] #temporary list to store the row for j in range(n): row.append(int(input())) #add the input to row list A.append(row) #add the row to the list print(A) # [[1, 2, 3], [4, 5, 6], [7, 8, 9]] #Display the 2D array print("Display Array In Matrix Form") for i in range(n): for j in range(n): print(A[i][j], end=" ") #new line print() B=[] n=int(input("Enter N for N x N matrix : ")) #3 here #use list for storing 2D array #get the user input and store it in list (here IN : 1 to 9) for i in range(n): row=[] #temporary list to store the row for j in range(n): row.append(int(input())) #add the input to row list B.append(row) #add the row to the list print(B) # [[1, 2, 3], [4, 5, 6], [7, 8, 9]] #Display the 2D array print("Display Array In Matrix Form") for i in range(n): for j in range(n): print(B[i][j], end=" ") print() #new line result = [[0,0,0], [0,0,0], [0,0,0]] # iterate through rows for i in range(n): # iterate through columns for j in range(len(A[0])): result[i][j] = A[i][j] + B[i][j] for r in result: Output Enter N for N x N matrix : 3 10 10 10 20 20 20 30 30 30 [[10, 10, 10], [20, 20, 20], [30, 30, 30]] Display Array In Matrix Form 10 10 10 20 20 20 30 30 30 Enter N for N x N matrix : 3 100 100 100 200 200 200 300 300 300 [[100, 100, 100], [200, 200, 200], [300, 300, 300]] Display Array In Matrix Form 100 100 100 200 200 200 300 300 300 [220, 220, 220] [330, 330, 330]

What Episode Does Luffy Use Gear 5 In One Piece Anime?

Ever since Eiichiro Oda revealed the true power of Luffy’s devil fruit and virtually shattered the internet last year when the Gear 5 power was introduced in the manga, One Piece fans have been waiting for its anime adaptation with bated breath. The manga fans have hyped Luffy’s Gear 5 to the point where even anime-only fans began to read about Luffy’s Gear 5 technique and the episode that will adapt it to understand what the hype is all about.

Spoiler Warning: This article contains spoilers about Luffy’s new gear power. We suggest you watch the anime and read the manga first to avoid ruining your experience.

Well if you want a recap of all the gears that Luffy uses in One Piece, check out our linked article. Also, if you want to learn more about the Gear 5 technique before watching the episode, we have you covered. That said, let’s get back to the release info of the Gear 5 episode:

As of now, Kid and Law vs Big Mom has come to a conclusion with the former emerging as the winner. And this week’s episode has already started teasing the Luffy vs Kaido showdown with the former being defeated and passed out. It is only a matter of weeks now, but we have got a break in between due to scheduling issues. We will finally get to witness the pinnacle of Luffy’s powers in One Piece in the first week of August. The upcoming One Piece anime broadcast schedule is as follows:

Here are the release timings for the Gear 5 episode of the One Piece anime across various countries around the world:

Japan – 09:30 AM (JST)

Brazil – 11:00 PM (BRT)

U.S.A – 09:00 PM (CDT)

India – 07:30 AM (IST)

France – 04:00 AM (CEST)

Philippines – 10:00 AM (PT)

UK – 03:00 AM (BST)

South Africa – 04:00 AM (SAST)

Australia – 12:00 PM (AEST)

Russia – 05:00 AM (MST)

Additionally, the latest One Piece Film: Red (read all the One Piece movies in order here) was released on August 6, 2023, and it featured an easter egg for Luffy’s Gear 5 technique. After exactly one year, we will be getting our hands on the original Gear 5 animation, which is a big coincidence.

Where to Watch One Piece Luffy Gear 5 Episode?

The most awaited Luffy Gear 5 episode will be streamed on the regular streaming platforms where One Piece is being broadcasted weekly. The availability of One Piece on top anime streaming platforms varies from region to region. For example, Crunchyroll US and Netflix US have One Piece in their library, but it isn’t available in India on these streaming platforms.

Still, Crunchyroll is the safest bet for those looking to stream One Piece. Since Crunchyroll is the one simulcasting every episode weekly, it is the right platform for you to stream the upcoming Gear 5 episode. Furthermore, these are the streaming platforms where you can stream One Piece (but we currently don’t know if they will be able to simulcast this episode except Crunchyroll):





Pluto TV

Note: For fans who are Crunchyroll members but One Piece isn’t available in your country, you can try using VPN to switch your region to the US or any other supported region to stream the Gear 5 episode. But be warned beforehand since most of the streaming platforms don’t like seeing their subscribers switching regions, it could result in an account ban.

Gear 5 Episode in One Piece: Countdown Timer


Update the detailed information about Part 5) Two Heads In Place Of One on the website. We hope the article's content will meet your needs, and we will regularly update the information to provide you with the fastest and most accurate information. Have a great day!