You are reading the article Why Is Corporate Linux Welcoming Microsoft? updated in December 2023 on the website Cattuongwedding.com. We hope that the information we have shared is helpful to you. If you find the content interesting and meaningful, please share it with your friends and continue to follow and support us for the latest updates. Suggested January 2024 Why Is Corporate Linux Welcoming Microsoft?
Suddenly, after years of mistrust, corporate Linux is welcoming Microsoft in to its midst. Almost overnight, executives from Jim Zemlin of The Linux Foundation down have lined up at the microphone to explain how the lines between proprietary and free software are blurring, and how Microsoft has had a sincere change of heart.
Nor is the evidence lacking for this position. Since at least 2005, Microsoft has been sending employees to Linux conferences and sponsoring open source events. It has contributed to the kernel, released its .Net code, added support for major distributions to Azure Cloud, collaborated with Canonical Software to bring the BASH shell and Ubuntu to Windows, and countless other things as well.
Yet these events can equally well — if not better — be interpreted as Microsoft simply facing up to the market, and making changes to make its own products more appealing. So why does corporate Linux so consistently insist that such events mark the start of a new era of cooperation?
An obvious reason is that, after years of Linux and free software being the underdogs, Microsoft’s interest in open source smells like victory. Linux users have joked about wanting world domination for decades, and having your arch enemy seemingly defect to your side is easy to mistake for the accomplishment of that goal.
Perhaps, too, corporate Linux could feel that recent events prove that its reactions were right and the community’s wrong. In the community, many are almost as suspicious of corporate Linux as they are of Microsoft. But if the corporate view predicted Microsoft’s current behavior, then it must be more accurate than the community’s.
By extension, other corporate outlooks could also be true. That is, open source is not a new way of doing business, with new relationships between rivals, and between businesses and customers, the way that many in the community would have it. Instead, open source is just a way of bring products more quickly to market, and for growing the market more quickly as well. Rather than the foundations that support key software, open source might be no more than a trade association of the kind responsible for the rapid growth of OpenStack and cloud computing.
However, the main attitude that encourages corporate Linux to welcome Microsoft is probably far more basic: working with Microsoft lends credibility.
Working within Linux and open source, you can easily forget how small a market it is. Red Hat is the largest corporation within Linux, but, compared to Microsoft, it is a small effort, with less than 8,000 employees and two billion in annual revenue compared to Microsoft´s 114,000 employees and 94 billion revenue.
The next largest Linux companies are even smaller.Canonical Software and SUSE are both private companies, so their income is unreported, but both have around 700 employees apiece.
In other words, what is easy to miss if you are working with Linux and open source regularly is how small their corporate presence actually is. Probably, the average computer user has never heard of Red Hat, Canonical, or SUSE.
However, when a small company welcomes a megacorporation into its professional association or signs an agreement with one, its name is reported in places where it is rarely heard. By association, it becomes a player.
For example, take the case of Canonical. Founded in 2004, it has never reported a profit, although its OpenStack division did well enough in 2023 that going public was briefly an option.
In such circumstances, porting BASH and Ubuntu to Windows is not going to make Canonical profitable. In fact, the number of Windows users interested in this news is probably minimal. However, to be identified as a Microsoft partner helps builds Canonical’s reputation, lending a validity that could help to establish other partnerships, both with Microsoft and other large corporations. In the long run, what might seem like a gesture to the community in the short run might help Canonical reach profitability.
Similarly, just as Microsoft tries to promote interest in Azure, so Canonical, by adding support for Microsoft to its OpenStack solutions, can hope to extend its potential market. Given that its OpenStack department is Canonical’s most likely tool for profitability, the importance of working with Microsoft can hardly be underestimated.
Other Linux companies may not need such a boost as badly as Canonical, but none are in a position to refuse it. If accepting Microsoft as a can help them, they are going to welcome their former arch-competitor with every sign of enthusiasm.
Members of the Linux community, still wary of Microsoft, sometimes assume that welcoming the corporation is a form of naiveté.
Instead, I suspect that corporate Linux is playing a long game. If anything, companies face a greater challenge from Microsoft than community members do. After all, Microsoft’s attempts to collect from alleged patent violations in Android is unlikely to be applied to individuals. The worst the community is likely to suffer is the removal of a few devices from the market while manufacturers re-tool. By contrast, accusations of patent violation could cripple a company’s profit.
Corporations can hardly be unaware of such a possibility. Instead, I suspect they are being seduced by the promise of respectability by association. If accepting Microsoft and ignoring past competition can help their long term strategies, then most will be all too happy not only to accept Microsoft, but welcome it with a party complete with fireworks as well. In the long run, they will probably be better off than demonstrating whatever distrust remains.
You're reading Why Is Corporate Linux Welcoming Microsoft?
In recent years, Linux has become a popular choice for server operating systems, competing with Windows in enterprise world. There are several reasons why Linux is considered better than Windows for servers, ranging from cost-effectiveness to security. In this article, we will explore five reasons why Linux is a better choice for servers than Windows.Open Source
In contrast, Windows is a proprietary operating system, which means that Microsoft controls code and does not allow users to modify it. This can be a limitation for server administrators who need more flexibility to configure their systems.Cost-Effectiveness
Furthermore, Linux is often seen as more efficient in terms of resource utilization, which means that it can run on lower-spec hardware, saving organizations money on hardware costs.Security
Security is a crucial consideration for servers, and Linux has a reputation for being more secure than Windows. This is due to several factors, including its open-source nature, which allows developers to identify and fix security vulnerabilities quickly.
Additionally, Linux has a modular design, which means that it is easier to remove or disable unnecessary components that can introduce security risks. In contrast, Windows has a more monolithic design, which makes it more difficult to secure.Stability
Linux is known for its stability, which is a critical factor for servers that need to be up and running 24/7. Linux systems are designed to be highly reliable, with fewer crashes and downtime compared to Windows.
Furthermore, Linux has a robust community of developers who work to maintain and improve operating system. This means that bugs and other issues are addressed quickly, reducing risk of downtime caused by software problems.Scalability
Finally, Linux is known for its scalability, which means that it can handle large amounts of traffic and data. Linux is often used for high-performance computing and other large-scale applications, making it an ideal choice for servers.
Additionally, Linux has a wide range of tools and applications available to help administrators manage and monitor large server installations. This makes it easier to scale up or down as needed, without sacrificing performance or stability.Compatibility
Linux has excellent compatibility with a wide range of hardware and software. This is because it supports a variety of architectures, including x86, ARM, and PowerPC, among others. Additionally, Linux has built-in support for a vast range of software, including web servers, databases, and other applications commonly used in enterprise environments.Customizability
Linux’s open-source nature makes it highly customizable. This means that administrators can tailor operating system to meet their specific needs, including tweaking system settings, modifying kernel, and creating custom scripts to automate tasks. This flexibility is crucial for server administrators who need to create bespoke solutions for their organization.Support
While Linux is open-source and available for free, it also has a robust community of developers and users who provide support and contribute to its development. This means that users have access to a wealth of information, tutorials, and forums where they can find answers to their questions and get help with troubleshooting issues.
Additionally, there are several commercial Linux vendors, such as Red Hat and SUSE, that provide paid support and services to enterprises. This support can be particularly valuable for organizations that require 24/7 assistance with their servers.Performance
Linux is renowned for its performance, particularly in high-performance computing and other demanding applications. This is due to its lightweight design, which uses fewer resources than Windows, allowing it to run more efficiently. Additionally, Linux’s modular design means that administrators can remove unnecessary components, further improving performance.Licensing Conclusion
In conclusion, Linux is a better choice than Windows for servers for several reasons, including its open-source nature, cost-effectiveness, security, stability, and scalability. Linux offers more flexibility and customization options, making it easier for administrators to configure their systems to meet their specific needs.
Furthermore, Linux has a reputation for being highly reliable and secure, making it an ideal choice for organizations that need to keep their servers up and running 24/7. Finally, Linux’s scalability makes it an excellent choice for high-performance computing and other large-scale applications, making it a preferred option for many enterprise organizations.
Microsoft Teams has emerged as an invaluable tool during the pandemic, especially for business-minded, strictly professional workplaces. It doesn’t let you play and work as some of the competitors, but it’s also arguably better than the competition when it comes to sheer productivity.
Microsoft Teams is one of Microsoft’s most valued corporate solutions. So, it’s no surprise that the company pushes hard to make the service as reliable and versatile as possible. In late August, Microsoft introduced one such productivity feature to Teams called Coordinated Meetings. And today, we’ll tell you how it could affect your workplace.
Related: How to use Onenote in Microsoft Teams?
What is Coordinated Meetings?
Microsoft Teams is available on all platforms, including non-Microsoft systems. And by default, the experience is as cohesive as you’d expect. Coordinated Meetings simply builds on the idea by enabling seamless connectivity for select Microsoft Teams users.
With the help of Teams Rooms devices and Surface Hubs, Coordinated Meetings allows your all your devices to join a single Teams meeting in a heartbeat. When Coordinated Meetings is enabled, a single connection from one of the devices would prompt other devices to join the same meeting.
By automatically signing in other devices to the same meeting, Coordinated Meetings cuts down latency, considerably, making the process feel more organic.
Related: What is Microsoft Teams Auditorium Mode?
What are the requirements for Coordinated Meetings?
As mentioned at the start of the article, Coordinated Meetings isn’t for every Microsoft Teams user. To use this feature, you’d need to meet some very specific and demanding criteria.
First: your organizations must have one or more Teams Rooms devices. These Microsoft Teams certified devices don’t come cheap, of course, which is why they are a rarity in most workplaces.
Second: your organization must also have a Microsoft Surface Hub. This would be primarily used as a whiteboard. If you have a Surface Hub 2S, we regret to inform you that the device isn’t supported. Since Hub 2S has its own operating system, it can’t work flawlessly with other systems.
Third: all the devices taking part in Coordinated Meetings must have their own Exchange room mailbox. They must also be pre-configured. So, that they are able to join a meeting when called upon.
Fourth: Microsoft assures that all organizations have the full liberty of configuring their devices as they see fit. However, it is recommended that Teams Rooms devices are used as the primary audio and video devices, while the Surface Hub takes up the role of the illustrator.
Related: 11 ways to fix Microsoft Teams’ audio issues
What are the benefits of Coordinated Meetings?
If you can look past the elaborate decorum, you’ll notice that there are a couple of very neat benefits to this system. First and foremost is the ease of use. Once a device in a Teams Room connects to a meeting, all other devices follow suit. This phenomenon reduces the hassle and allows the participants to focus solely on the meeting and not on connection issues.
Also, since Coordinated Meetings are completely customizable, your organization can simply opt to use the best audio and visual devices while keeping the others turned off. This makes sure that the participants only enjoy the best audio/visual experience and no subpar devices are on board.
Since you’re only adding the best devices to the meeting, you also eliminate the super annoying echo and feedback that most participants experience while trying to connect multiple devices to a meeting.
Related: What is a Channel in Microsoft Teams?
Why should your workplace opt for Coordinated Meetings?
Now that you’re familiar with Coordinated Meetings, let’s take a look at how your workplace might benefit from the same.
Firstly, having a Coordinated Meeting setup makes sure all employees are on the same page and no one is suffering from quality issues. Since only the best devices are used, the audio and video quality is as good as possible, there’s no echo or feedback, and there is no noticeable lag in play here.
Microsoft has clarified that one would need a Microsoft Surface Hub to kick off Coordinated Meetings. And if used correctly, the Surface Hub can be one gem of an addition. Since it’s loaded with features, you can hardly get a better second screen/whiteboard for your meetings. The 120Hz screen, coupled with at least a 100-point multi-touch sensor, guarantees limitless illustrations for your meetings.
To set up Coordinated Meetings, simply go through Microsoft’s detailed documentation, and you’ll be up and running in no time.
It kills me to say this: The dream of Linux as a major desktop OS is now pretty much dead.
Over the past few years, modern Linux distributions such as Ubuntu have utterly transformed the open-source desktop user experience into something sleek and simple, while arguably surpassing Windows and Mac OS in both security and stability. Meanwhile, the public failure of Windows Vista and the rise of the netbook gave Linux some openings to capture a meaningful slice of the market. But those opportunities have been squandered and lost, and Linux desktop market share remains stagnant at around 1 percent.
I should emphasize that I’m not by any means talking about the demise of Linux itself. New projections from the Linux Foundation credibly show that demand for Linux on servers will outstrip demand for all other options over the next few years. And, as I’ll discuss at length in this article, Linux has already established itself as a dominant operating system on mobile and embedded devices ranging from tablets and phones to TVs and printers.
But for anyone who has longed for a future in which free, open-source Linux distributions would rival premium commercial operating systems from Microsoft and Apple on desktop PCs, now might be a good time to set more-realistic expectations. Though I personally wish that the opposite were true, the year of the Linux desktop will never come.Missed Opportunities
A few years ago, I infamously went on record with the belief that the stage had been set for a significant breakthrough in Linux adoption rates. After all, Ubuntu had created a virtually idiot-proof distribution that was as easy to install as Windows or Mac OS X. Hardware driver support had reached critical mass. Even major PC makers such as Dell had stepped up to offer Linux as a preinstalled option on laptops and desktops.
At the same time, consumer sentiment toward Windows Vista had reached such abysmal depths that users were clamoring for other options. And to sweeten the prospects just a bit more, the emergence of netbooks gave Linux a nearly unchallenged new platform to dominate for months on end. If there was ever a time for Linux to rise up, 2008 was that time. But it wasn’t meant to be.
By the time Microsoft released the Windows 7 beta in January 2009, Linux had clearly lost its chance at desktop glory.Why Linux Failed on the Desktop
Ultimately, Linux is doomed on the desktop because of a critical lack of content. And that lack of content owes its existence to two key factors: the fragmentation of the Linux platform, and the fierce ideology of the open-source community at large.
“I share the hope with everyone that free and open-source software will rise to meet the requirements of content delivery,” says longtime Linux developer Jeff Whatcott, senior vice president of marketing for Brightcove, a company that specializes in online video streaming. “But that’s not happening.”
“DRM is not popular with the open-source crowd,” says Whatcott, lamenting that the open-source community at large remains so steadfastly opposed to digital rights management technologies. Without those systems, commercial content providers have no incentive to embrace Linux. And Whatcott points out that even if the open-source community were willing to go along, the DRM arena is dominated by “deep, deep patent pools,” making a free, open-source alternative unlikely anyway.
Meanwhile, even common streaming technologies such as Flash–which Whatcott helped bring to Linux in his previous role as a Macromedia (and later Adobe) product manager–deliver poor results on Linux.
The word entrepreneur originates from the French word, entreprendre, which means “to undertake.” The concept of entrepreneurship has varied meanings.
Entrepreneur is considered to be a person with high aptitude and risk-taking ability ready to make a change; and
Entrepreneur is any person who wants to work for their own self, i.e., wants to start their own business enterprise.
Both these meanings are not co-related, however, they both form the meanings of an Entrepreneur.
Entrepreneurship is not just coming up with a great concept to start up a business. That is just a part of it. Successful entrepreneurship involves much more than just having a great idea or creating a new business venture. It is actually a mind-set that starts right from the beginning. It is a way of thinking and implementing your ideas. It is about generating new and innovative ways to resolve issues effectively, reach target audience in an affordable manner, and create market position with a steady pace, taking into consideration the availability of resources, changing demand patterns of the audience and most importantly the objectives and profits of the business.
Start Your Free Personal Development Course
Effective resume making, job hunting, campus recruitment training & othersEntrepreneur
For example, if a college graduate or a tech guy working from nine to five, does not want to get into the monotonous robotic routine, instead wants to create something on his own, say an app for the smart-phones that works on all the operating systems. He has an idea/concept in his mind and has calculated all the important aspects involved in starting up this venture as well as taking it forward to the target audience and making it a full-fledged business. He can both do this alone and become an Entrepreneur, or he can ask his mates or colleagues to join in and contribute. If they see this as a viable idea for long-run or do not want to join the routine job, they would join in. Along with it, they’ll bring in their own ideas, opinions, expertise, and resources, which will not only foster the business, but also divide the risk among all the members of the Entrepreneurial Team.Types of Entrepreneurs
Entrepreneurs are widely classified into various categories. There is no set basis on which the entrepreneurs are classified. Categorization can be done on the basis of:
Type of business
Stages of Development
Gender and Age
Size of Enterprises
These are some mentioned categories under which the entrepreneurs are classified. However, universally there might be more categories.Traits of an Entrepreneur
Entrepreneurs possess various qualities and traits that make them different and unique. It can be their mind-set, expertise, risk-bearing ability, knowledge, technical know-how, creativity and innovation, resources, so on and so forth. They are disciplined, optimistic and confident self starters. They embrace new and fresh ideas and changes crossing their way. Following are the universal qualities that an entrepreneur has:
Focused (clarity in terms of objectives and goals, profit oriented, use timelines, crisp and clear communication, focus on human element)
Confident (self-awareness, action-oriented, conviction, pro-active, futuristic, avoid short-cuts)
Creative Thinker (new and fresh ideas, curious, alert, synthesised solutions, imaginative, quick learner, prioritises, balances between present & future)
Delegator (encourages team contribution, maintain equilibrium between authority & responsibility, determine people’s expertise, give effective feedback)
Determined (eager to learn & act, shares optimism, persistent, face and overcome obstacles, alertness toward changing environment)
Independent (Self-belief, multi-tasking, dedication towards main objective, ‘can-do attitude’)
Knowledge-seeker (share and welcome ideas, anticipate & use knowledge as an asset, communicates to get others’ viewpoints and opinions both in and out the organization, drive for in-depth information, prioritise)
Strong People Skills and Work Ethics (enthusiastic, speaker and communicator, arrives first & leaves last, leader, sell a product and/or service, motivate and encourage people around, highlight the benefits of any situation, use different media to communicate and inspire, meet expectations)
Relationship-builder (Network inside and outside the business, diversify beneficial links, selective, socially aware and exposed, open-minded, reciprocity, integrity)
Risk-Taker (rational decision maker, practical and logical approach, charismatic and bold, optimistic and calm, will to win and deal with complex situations, take incremental risks and systematically experiment)
“Entrepreneurship is the horse, and innovation is the cart,” Clifton and Badal explain.Corporate Entrepreneurship vs Social Entrepreneurship
Corporate Entrepreneurship has been recognized as a prospectively viable means for promoting and maintaining the performance, renewal and corporate competitiveness of an organization over the past couple of decades. The entrepreneurial activities assist organizations to develop new business-lines that further sources for revenues. Corporate Entrepreneurship activities also improve a company’s work culture by promoting product and process innovations, thus leading to success. Corporate Entrepreneurship is incorporating risk bearing, pro-activeness and progressive product innovations. These Corporate Entrepreneurship activities can enhance organizational growth and profitability and, their impact may increase over time depending on the organization’s competitive environment. The practical evidence is gripping that Corporate Entrepreneurship boosts company’s performance by enhancing the firm’s pro-activeness and willingness to bear risks, and by instigating the development of new products, process and services by upgrading its competitiveness.
Creation of corporate entrepreneurial activity is not an easy task as it involves changing the internal behavioral patterns of an organization. The environment plays a major role and radical influencing. It has been agreed on that the external environment is an important factor leading to Corporate Entrepreneurship.
Corporate Entrepreneurship has been known for renewing and revitalizing current companies. It serves as a tool for business development, revenue growth, profitability enhancement and instigating, developing and innovating products, services and processes (Kuratko et al., Lumpkin & Dess, Miles & Covin, Zahra, Zahra & Covin, Zahra et al.).
A rapidly growing and dynamic sector of the industry today, social entrepreneurs play a pivotal role in providing products and services with the prime motive of creating social well-being, operating from a 3-tier bottom line perspective benefitting People, Planet, and Profit. Profit in the social enterprises is reinvested into the enterprise rather than being distributed among the stakeholders and founders. Social enterprises operate on different models. Such enterprises have an entirely different legal structure created, thus distinguishing them from charities, in being self-sustaining through income. Social enterprises have been persistently survived for any economy and contribute remarkably to the revenues.
People finding meaning in their work are shifting to social entrepreneurship which kills two birds with one arrow by helping the society and succeeding in their ambitions with a different approach altogether. Social entrepreneurs are demographically spread across the world from young to old and from different type of background, stature, and education.
Social entrepreneurs are innovators who commit themselves to the need of the society, and on making products and services that solve social issues and problems. Unlike traditional startups and business ventures, their goal is to make the world a better place to live in, and not to take market share or to generate profits for the founders. Social entrepreneurs may be categorized as:
Christopher Poizat, Founder & President of International Network of Social-Eco Entrepreneurs has defined Social Entrepreneurs as, “people who recognize social problems, decide to roll up their sleeves and get into action using entrepreneurial principles to organize, create, and manage a venture to implement social change that is sustainable, good for the planet and for the highest good of humanity.”Are social entrepreneurs really ‘Entrepreneurs’?
The social entrepreneurs truly possess entrepreneurial traits, but with a completely different mindset and skill sets. They are the ones who are wholly and solely involved in activities benefiting the society and focus on its well-being. They mainly emphasize on impacting the social, economic, and cultural environment of the nation in a positive and constructive manner. Social Entrepreneurs want to make a difference to the world: they are passionate and eager about the cause that they have chosen and are highly motivated and enthused about their mission to change the society and help the ones in need.Corporate Entrepreneurship vs Social Entrepreneurship
Basis Corporate Entrepreneurship Social Entrepreneurship
Main Objective Building a business and maximizing profits Creating social change
Wealth Creation Wealth is same as Profits Wealth means creating and maintaining social and environmental capital
Measure of Profitability Benefiting shareholders and investors Engage in for-profit activities
Investors Venture Capitalists Philanthropists
Emphasis on Team and Individual Venture Capitalists invest in business on the basis of company’s leadership team and the organization supporting it Individuals raise and donate money for charitable causes on the basis of viability of the project gauged by the individual in charge.
Performance Measurement Corporate entrepreneurs can rely on relatively tangible and quantifiable measures of performance such as financial indicators, market share, customer satisfaction, and quality. Measuring social change is difficult due to its non-quantifiable and multi-causal characteristics, and perceptive differences of the social impact created.
Entrepreneurs whether social, corporate or any other, majorly focus on creating profits whether for the organization or social well-being. The foremost responsibility is to benefit the people either inside or outside the organization. The entrepreneurs tend to start a business venture in order to bring changes in their lifestyle, and routine, and tend to boost social and economic development. Entrepreneurship is generating a business, starting and running a new business, and maintaining it in a long-run. Entrepreneurs take and bear risks, are focused, determined, innovative and creative, confident and bold, posses a can-do and go-getter attitude. They are self-motivated and have strong work ethics and people skills. The best part about entrepreneurship is that the business idea can be small or big, whether in an urban area or rural, involving any amount of capital, tangible or intangible, its gives an opportunity to grow and make changes in the society to the person or group generating the idea. These changes can range from generating employment opportunities to impacting the society in a positive manner.
Entrepreneurs have a powerful ability to change the way a society survives and runs. If successful, their innovations might enhance our standards of living. In short, an entrepreneur not only creates wealth and generates profits from the business venture, but also they also create jobs and the conditions for a developing society.Recommended Articles
Here are some articles that will help you to get more detail about the Corporate Entrepreneurship vs Social Entrepreneurship so just go through the link.
We’ve all heard of defragmentation. But first, what is fragmentation of data? To explain this concept, one of the best example you can find is the one used by Roberto Di Cosmo in a conference of 1998:
Your hard drive (or any other storing device) is like a shelf divided in boxes. All the boxes are of the same size and you use the shelf to store folders and files. When the shelf is empty, it is easy to put a folder in a box. If the folder is too large to fit in one box, you divide it and store the excess in the box next to it. You can do that as long as you have enough space left. However, when you are dealing with data on a computer, especially the one used by programs, the size varies a lot. Some files get bigger, deleted or moved. So really quickly, your shelf becomes a mess. Some boxes are half-empty, others cannot contain a growing folder. There are no free boxes at the bottom of the shelf (you started at the top) but you still need to store a new folder. Therefore you search for some free spaces in the previous boxes. In the end, your folder is divided and stored with some other parts of folders. You can imagine how difficult it is going to be in order to fetch the entire file in the shelf. Even if you wrote down where you stored the different parts, you still have to search in different boxes to gather all the files.
You can now imagine the pain of your computer searching for a file when the disk is really fragmented. Compared to your processor’s speed, the time needed by your hard drive to find a fragmented folder is a little eternity. So in order to stop the sufferings and the delays, we use the defragmentation process. It basically does what it sounds like: takes everything out and try to put all the folders back in order, getting rid of the wasted spaces and storing the divided parts back next to each other.Why it does not concern Linux
Linux does not face the problem of the shelf. At least not to that extent. This is due to type of file system created specially for Linux: ext4. Ext4, like other file systems, manages the data and the space on a hard drive, but also does its best to prevent fragmentation. Going back to the shelf concept, when you store a folder into a box, ext4 will automatically book the neighboring boxes. It tries to anticipate the folder expansion, and actually does it quite well. That way, no folders will be divided and the shelf will remain ordered.
The downside is that the method requires a lot of free space. If there are no boxes left in the shelf, ext4 will have no choice but to go back to the old method of filling the holes. This can happen if you have less than 20% of free space left on your hard drive. So in general, your hard drive is not fragmented, or if it is, it is frequently less than 3% of its size.Conclusion
Image credit: Storage by BigStockPhoto
Adrien is a young but passionate Linux aficionado. Command line, encryption, obscure distributions… you name it, he tried it. Always improving his system, he encountered multiple tricks and hacks and is ready to share them. Best things in the world? Math, computers and peanut butter!
Subscribe to our newsletter!
Our latest tutorials delivered straight to your inbox
Sign up for all newsletters.
Update the detailed information about Why Is Corporate Linux Welcoming Microsoft? on the Cattuongwedding.com website. We hope the article's content will meet your needs, and we will regularly update the information to provide you with the fastest and most accurate information. Have a great day!